In a rare instance of bipartisan alarm, Republican-chaired committees in the House and Senate announced that they have launched inquiries into an explosive Washington Post report alleging Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had given a spoken order to “kill everybody” aboard a vessel carrying suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean. The occupants included two people who had survived an initial missile strike on the vessel and were seen “clinging” to the wreckage.

“We take seriously the reports of follow-on strikes on boats alleged to be ferrying narcotics in the SOUTHCOM region and are taking bipartisan action to gather a full accounting of the operation in question,” the leaders of the House Armed Services Committee said in a joint statement on Friday.

“The Committee has directed inquiries to the [Department of Defense], and we will be conducting vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances,” leaders in the Senate Armed Services Committee said.

The September 2 attack kicked off what has now been nearly two dozen attacks, killing at least 83 people, who the US military claims, without evidence, had been attempting to smuggle drugs into the US. The attacks, which President Trump justifies as a part of an “armed conflict” with drug cartels, have been likened to extrajudicial killings.

Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona told CNN on Sunday that Hegseth’s actions, as reported by the Post, appear to be a war crime.

“If what has been reported is accurate, I’ve got serious concerns about anybody in that chain of command stepping over a line that they should never step over,” Kelly said. “We are not Russia. We are not Iraq. We hold ourselves to a very high standard of professionalism.”

Kelly is locked in a related battle of words with Hegseth after Kelly participated in a social media video with five other Democrats seeking to remind members of the military that they can “refuse illegal orders.”

Hegseth has blasted the *Post’*s reporting on the missile strikes as “fabricated.”

“As usual, the fake news is delivering more fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting to discredit our incredible warriors fighting to protect the homeland,” he wrote on X.

  • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ah yes, ye olde “I’m not responsible for those under me” excuse that SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WAR CRIMES Rumsfeld wheeled out after the whole Abu Ghraib thing. It worked then. It’ll work this time, too.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    And I just want to point out that the military followed this, clearly illegal, order without hesitation…

    Muricans, the military is not going to save you from the horrendous mistake you made by empowering the idiot king and his jesters

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        America has a long long history of war crimes… I hope I’m wrong but I doubt much will come from this other than someone losing a job just to get a better one in a hush deal

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hey guys, guess what? I’m from the future. Here’s what happened: They launched an investigation, found out he did exactly that and then…nothing fucking happened. You’re welcome.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hey now, you’re leaving out the letter they put together which strongly recommends that he resign of his own free will, despite having no obligation to do so.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh yeah, old Schumer fell asleep in the middle of reading it to them and wagging his finger.

  • Mastengwe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is a reason he wants everyone on those boats dead. No survivors means no one to refute the claim that they weren’t just fishermen, but drug runners.

    There no other logical reason to “blow apart” people clinging to debris after being hit by a rocket.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I was just thinking they could be testing the waters on this whole illegal order thing.

      If they can get away with this, it dampens the whole don’t follow illegal order stuff going on.

      Edit: Like if nobody involved in that chain of command, gets punished, then the whole don’t follow illegal orders becomes more moot. They have to hold someone accountable to show it’s true, and they likely won’t do that, and if they can’t punish something like this, what’s going to happen to that kid who refuses an order to shoot at a crowd of protesters who are ANTIFA terrorists. This was people clinging onto a wreckage to stay alive.

  • jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like I’m missing something, but why is saying “kill everybody” crossing a line for the Republicans? When you shoot missiles at a boat it kinda feels like you’re already trying to kill everyone?

    • Djehngo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because the implication of “kill everybody” is that surrender will be refused, and issuing such a “no quarter” order is a war crime.

      This is shortly after Hegseth fired a few judge advocate generals (military lawyers ish) since he viewed them as potential “roadblocks to orders that are given by a commander-in-chief.”

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s kinda my point though, to me both those incidents are small potatoes in comparison to bombing random boats in international water.

        Why do those small new details make the Republicans concerned when they were okay with bombing/killing random people (which I’m pretty sure is already a war crime)?

        • Djehngo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because there is a fig leaf of legality over the bombing.

          The excuse they run is that they have designated the cartel as a terrorist organisation (this stretches the definition of terrorism past breaking point), they have asserted that the boats are operated by the cartel (this is heavily disputed) and they suggest that terrorists “attacking” the US by importing drugs are enemy combatants and legitimate military targets.

          All of this is insane, but republicans have been going along with it with varying levels of enthusiasm.

          The problem here is that even if you buy the justification that marks the occupants or the boats as enemy combatants, that still doesn’t legally permit war crimes.

          The republicans in question agree with the method to paint them as enemy combatants, but don’t agree that war crimes are acceptable against enemy combatants.

          • jacksilver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Thanks, I appreciate the info/perspective.

            Based on that reasoning it sounds like Republicans are okay with “accidentally” committing a war crime, but if done flagrantly then they have a problem.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s because they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar, and now they need to distract from the cookies they’ve already taken.

  • PugJesus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    The September 2 attack kicked off what has now been nearly two dozen attacks, killing at least 83 people,

    Fuck, the death toll is already that high?

    Jesus H. Christ.

  • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    When I heard they were putting an alcoholic rapist in charge of the DoD, I was really hoping for more Kash Money shenanigans, and less war crimey shenanigans.