• Yardy Sardley@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Jesus christ I thought the franklin thing was somone clowning on hegseth, not a post he actually made himself. Reality has become indistinguishable from satire.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “Narco-terrorists” isn’t a thing that existed until Trump and Hegseth wanted to murder people on a boat with missiles from the stratosphere without involving any available legal system.

    • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Not really, that term emerged out of the peak of the Mexican cartel wars of the early 2000s.

      Or at least, that’s when it gained popularity.

      It’s just been repurposed to fit their needs.

        • FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Yeah i think a lot of countries, especially middle powers like Canada, hadn’t thought that we’d retreat from a rules based international order so easily. Now everyone is scrambling to porcupine their countries to dissuade great military powers from adventurism. Everyone worked so hard on nuclear disarmament but now that could ironically be our downfall.

          • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Canada is one of the few non-nuclear-armed countries in the world that has so much nuclear technology, expertise, infrastructure, and resources, that we are considered effectively zero days away from nuclear weapons. In other words before anyone else discovered we were considering pursuing nuclear weapons, we would already be armed with them. For the intents and purposes of most risk assessments, Canada is already nuclear armed, just without the expense of doing all the work of building, testing and maintaining them. This presumes we could start (or perhaps already have started?) such a program clandestinely, which remains to be seen, of course, and depending on your point of view, could be argued to be pretty unlikely. Our level of preparation could certainly be called into question in the event of a surprise attack, by say, our closest ally, trading partner and neighbor. You’d have to be sort of nuts to imagine such a bizarre scenario. It is an interesting thought experiment though.

          • Wren@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            It’s okay! We still have most of the uranium and our reactors make plutonium as a by-product. We don’t need to stock nuclear cakes when the pantry is overflowing and the oven is pre-heated.

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Time to come destroy the white house again — oh wait. They just did it themselves.