Hey Folks!

We’ve been playing and discussing Calibri, Aptos ( Bierstadt ), Grandview, Seaford, Tenorite and Skeena over on Tildes and I figured you folks would enjoy clicking around and seeing what the differences between them actually are.

I wrote the article, so let me know if there’s something you’d like to see as well :D

Cheers !

  • I don’t mind Calibri, but Aptos does look like an improvement. I particularly like the serif added to the lowercase L… it has always annoyed me how that and uppercase I look exactly the same in many fonts. It’s one of the reasons why I’m partial to fonts with serifs.

    • jdsalaro@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      but Aptos does look like an improvement

      I think so too! Did you click through the Lorem Ipsum examples? Aptos is much easier on the eyes even in dense paragraphs.

      I particularly like the serif added to the lowercase L

      For the record, my calling those serifs has been a point of contention. To me Aptos feels like a semi-serif, not a sans-serif, although it’s officially one! However, it’s been suggested to me that I should do away with the serif terminology and call them simply stroke terminals!

      Still mulling over this.

    • Laneus@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh my god yes! future generations will be shocked that it took us that long to solve that particular typography problem.

  • Edlennion@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are the “display” variants of the new fonts in that article? In the examples, they’re the ones with a * appended. They look much narrower to me (which I like).

    I’m not at my PC right now, so it may just be that there’s an “Aptos Display” font or something 😅

    • Backslash@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes they’re usually called “<fontfamily> Display”. IIRC Display variants are optimized to be used on digital displays (usually on the web), where a lower resolution (72ish DPI) than printing (~300 DPI) is quite common.

    • jdsalaro@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are the “display” variants of the new fonts in that article? They’re called that, at least on Office 365: Aptos Display, Grandview Display, etc.

      • jlow (he/him)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        From what I know display font variants are intended for short text, so book titles movie posters, maybe headings but not body text. They usually bolder with more flourishes and look best if they’re big on the page but might not be very readable in long, small formats.

  • LucyLastic@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still adapting to Calibri … I liked arial because it was usually near the top of the font list so it was easy to find, lol

    • jdsalaro@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I liked arial

      OK, you’re the only person who has managed to make me angry hehe :)

      Someone actually likes Arial ??!!

      • LucyLastic@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aside from using it to make jokes? It’s not bad, a legible sans-serif that renders well on low resolution screens. A lot of discussions about “clean” fonts seem to squabble over minutiae while the important part of being readable seems forgotten.

  • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m gonna miss the compactness of Calibri. I might have to reduce my font sizes now if I want to use Aptos in my pre-existing spreadsheets.

  • chinpokomon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Grandview seemed to do the best in clearly identifying the character 0. Is it an O, 0, I, l, or 1? Even without an example of O clearly visible in the sample text, the shape of 0 was very clear and seems like it should stand apart. Not the only reason to select a font, but it might be important to some.

    • jdsalaro@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you ! I’m a bit overwhelmed by the positive resonance so far, so now I’m wondering what to write after that will give me the same high haha :)

    • jdsalaro@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is that :D ?

      Not that I disagree with you, as it’s also my favorite, but just wanting to hear your reasons :)

  • shakesbeare@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow I always new I hated Calibri but looking at it up close REALLY made me hate it. I don’t know what it is about that font but I just can’t stand it.

  • GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    On that paragraph about prominence, what I do notice is that the letters are way more closed, with less noticeable gaps, for example with a letter ‘c’. To those with weaker eyesight, the letters may be seen as an ‘o’. But a great article and I liked the comparisons.

    • jdsalaro@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now that you say that, I liked Aptos’ G, but now I dislike it because it’ll likely make things harder for people with poor eyesight.