California voters have rejected Prop 32, which would have raised the state’s minimum wage from $16 to $18.

With 100% of the ballots tallied, the measure was rejected by a 0.8% margin (50.8 - 49.2), according to the California Secretary of State’s office. The total vote difference for the proposition was 234,146.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What a poorly written headline (not by OP). It makes it sound like rejecting the proposition will raise minimum wage by $2, when that’s what the proposition would have done. Technically correct, using the less-common usage of a comma to include a second subject. But if that’s not intentional and malicious, ABC News has a terrible editor…

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why would anyone vote against it?

    Maybe it was written by the same person who wrote the title of this Post? Lol

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because “back in my day” isn’t just Grandpa rambling. It’s also adults who resent their upbringing but are stupid enough to pass it on. First to their kids, and now to wage earners.

      Also people can be tricked by propaganda and lies pretty easily.

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Work in the trades. You’ll see a fuck ton of people who are against minimum wage going up.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        I work in the trades, in a deeply red state.

        There are a few against it but for the most part people I work with support a minimum wage raise.

        I work with some shitty people but don’t put that evil on us.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m sure they say a lot of things, but when it comes down to it, they likely vote for people who are fighting against raising the minimum wage. And if it came down to a ballot initiative, they would vote against it.

        • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s half the low that cost of living is tied to it, and half that they don’t want people who work “less hard” to make as much money as they do.

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That’s often the reason. We had some bullshit in my State during the election. It was worded in a way that despite being someone who enjoys doing the writing, I still felt like I had to look it up.

      Kaepora Gaebora can kiss my shiny metal ass, dammit.

    • RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It was in fact very badly written, with stuff like wage changes taking effect “immediately” (in practice 5 days after vote counts are certified).

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is there a place for posting titles that say the opposite of what they mean? Like the “Don’t Dead, Open Inside”. That comma ruins it. I can only assume they edited some words out of the one line without reading the result.