This is the way. Fuck passive aggressive. Be aggressive aggressive.

All of them ruled against an ethics framework. All can go. The Republicans need to be in prison, the democrats need disbarred.

I agree almost entirely with what youre saying but let’s not pretend like RGB not stopping down would have mattered. Republicans had already shown that they were willing to just leave the seat vacant for a year unless it was their guy nominating.

The torment nexus from the book, “Please dont ever build the Torment Nexus”? That Torment Nexus?

That has the added benefit of helping the grid when the bubble pops.

I mean… whatever theyre offering is gonna turn out worse than the Budhapest Memorandum

Id assume Trump would need to file a HIPPA release which ain’t happening.

Now if this was a democratic president the supreme court would say that by accepting taxpayer funded healthcare, the citizens are thereby the payor/insurance company and that HIPPA authorizes release of protected health information to payors so the public is allowed to know subpoenad health information without a release.

Im assuming you said a right winger, nazi, etc could kick rocks. Those kids could be future radical leftists!

Dude come on. Context alone.

That’s one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard. Are you serious? They consider downvotes originating from outside the instance, spam?

I mean outside of the fact by law you have to have car insurance.

I appreciate the video, but does he link the actual assignment or rubric? I know I can get a million opinions on it and I’ve seen the paper, but I want to know what the wording of the actual assignment is.

I haven’t seen the assignment or Rubric yet. Where’s that found?

Wait a minute…

No one ever accused any level of management of being intelligent. They’re just liked by the higher ups. At the executive level, they’re just heartless and mentally ill.

Both things can be true.

Hell yeah.

Hell yeah.

Improper formatting. No citations outside of indirect, incomplete citations of the Bible. No synthesis of thought from those passages. Heavily biased language throughout…

Id say charitably its worth a 30/100?

Where can we read the initial paper? Im sure the girl trying to get gold in the victim olympics posted it somewhere to feel justified. Id love to see for myself.

Edit: Muxika has posted the paper in this thread. Yeah its a dogshit F paper. Its a poorly formatted rant with no synthesis of new ideas, rehashing or contemplation of old ideas and somehow completely ignores history.