The information in your link is about school aged children, and it doesn’t say AI use automatically makes you dumber. It says:

The relationship between AI use and student performance is complex How AI use relates to student performance is complex, varying with how students use it and what for. PISA data show that students who use AI for specific schoolwork tasks, such as summarising texts, drafting or conducting research, attain lower scores in science than students who do not use AI. In these scenarios, students who do not use AI outperform those who do, on average, by around 20 points – equivalent to being around one year of schooling ahead of their peers. However, weekly users of AI for general purposes have similar performance outcomes to non-users. Students who regularly use AI for general purposes, and have learning opportunities at school to develop AI literacy skills, tend to have slightly higher scores in science. However, these opportunities are more common among socio-economically advantaged students, risking a growing AI divide.

So I’d conclude that kids shouldn’t be handed AI when they’re young. Not only that, they shouldn’t get to use it until they’re taught how.

I have a young kid and I don’t know what to do. I’m leaning towards keeping them away from AI as long as possible in the hopes that they build a very strong knowledge and problem solving foundation. Then AI can hopefully multiply their abilities.

And that brings me back to my original point. It will likely provide a competitive advantage to those that use it over those that don’t, but the size of that advantage depends on the abilities of the user.

I think about it like this: let’s say you don’t use AI but a majority of other people do. Let’s assume AI helps the majority do things faster or cheaper than you (maybe that’s not true yet, but it will probably be true soon). In this situation, if you’re not using AI then you’ll almost always lose to those that are. Therefore you should learn how to use it or else you’ll be left behind.

Wtf we make half that and are hardly putting anything away. What are you doing?

This meme is just libel. There’s no way a tankie would support the Confederacy

I guess it’s fair to discount my Korea example, that was a mass resignation aimed at government admissions policy, not a union bargaining with an employer. However I still think their is a similar undercurrent and I still worry a physicians’ union would have more power than most other unions.

My concern is what stops a physicians’ union from bargaining over things beyond improving their working conditions? As I mentioned, physicans in Korea were opposed to a policy that will likely be beneficial to their society and collectively acted in protest. That’s what makes police unions my pro-union exception. It’s not their pay, but contract terms covering discipline and internal investigations. If a Banner contract stayed on pay, panel size and staffing ratios, I have no problem with it, but what keeps those limits?

Does anyone know what’s on their bargaining agenda?

I’m generally extremely pro-union, but there are some exceptions, such as police unions. I’m concerned about the power a doctors union could weild. Something happened in South Korea that’s relevant. Doctors, or at least trainee doctors, in South Korea, went on strike in protest of the government increasing admission numbers to Korean medical schools. It sounded to me like they were protesting the training of more doctors than the norm, which doesn’t sound like a decent thing to protest imo.

This better not end with barrels of radioactive waste sitting around military bases. They have a bad track record when it comes to toxic chemicals escaping containment.

I agree. Based on my secondhand observations, pregnancy is 9 months of discomfort in one form or another, followed by plumbing problems for years afterwards. Nobody should go through that if they don’t wish to.

Here’s what they actually ruled on from CNBC:

• The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to move forward for now with key parts of President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting mail-in voting.

• The unsigned order lifted a lower-court injunction covering 23 states and Washington, D.C. The court’s three liberal justices dissented.

• A separate nationwide injunction still blocks the Postal Service from implementing its new mail-ballot procedures for the Nov. 3 elections.

You can still vote by mail according to that last bullet point

Okay then who ran those focus groups?

Okay nobody in this comment section read the paper. The authors looked at subterranean sequestration pilot studies and discussed the issues that were found. They did not suggest pursuing these types of sequestration methods were a waste of time, however engineering and policy challenges need to be overcome if these methods are going to deliver the needed sequestration rates.

This is just an energy production problem and not a chemistry problem

If we can reduce that demand as we continue to build out renewables, we can decommission fossil fuel power generation at huge rates.

That’s a fine idea but wouldn’t it be better to build out renewables specifically to decommission fossil generation.

First, those are rookie numbers, gotta do better. Second, how does this break down by age? Is the anti-DS sentiment spread out across the age range evenly, or is it concentrated at one end or the other? Third, I don’t understand how one could be opposed to DS unless they’re already fabulously wealthy and an asshole. What makes somebody anti-DS?

You didn’t watch the video

Okay, I doubt the people who would find a real-life freedom party appealing haven’t read turtledove

I think the tribalism, purity testing, and mod power tripping is far worse here than reddit. I was banned from memes.ml two days ago for pointing out it’s in bad taste to celebrate the deaths of American soliders, and I totally don’t support at all what Americans are doing in Iran or Palestine. After a couple back and forths I was banned for spam. I was responding to comments, explaining my position, not spamming. Then to top it off, I was banned from privacy.ml yesterday. I saw a user I was arguing with the previous day using an argument I taught them. I literally explained something to them in a DM, and they were using it correctly against someone else, and I was again banned for “spam.” A single silly “I’m proud of you” comment. Granted it was obvious that they clearly didn’t like me but still, you can’t get caught doing that and not expect me to say something. Very immature.

What I find funny about it all is they’re banning someone who’s on their team. I’m on board with most of the stereotypical .ml ideology (I don’t think we’d get along OP), but some users, and especially those with power, have no tolerance for any dissent. I don’t even think I was dissenting, just saying the evil facist bootlicking troops probably aren’t as evil as they want them to be, so don’t cheer when they die. Is that really too much for some people?

As someone who doesn’t read Turtledove, what does that mean?

I’m so proud of you

The problem to surmount is the decades of propaganda making the word socialism somehow demonic and evil.

It’s probably easier to change the party’s name. Lets just call it the Freedom party, because it is.