“It would be too complicated” == “Our company keeps losing money in frivolous court battles, so we have to remove planned content to sell it back to you later on to double dip on you paying us money for content that was supposed to be in the base game.”

Just you watch, Nintendo is gonna get a free pass. Ubisoft and EA do this all the time and get called out for it, but when Nintendo does it for some reason its a different story.

I mean, is it $50? Not a bad price for a Jeepthing golf cart…

Reminder that the ESA represents businesses that have a direct financial incentive to do stuff like this.

They do not represent consumers nor do they side with them, literally ever.

Wouldn’t be smart to create so much self competition by flooding the market with so many games, even from just a single publisher. People wouldn’t have enough time or money to buy and play them all. The business side would end up losing more money than it makes, which would easily lead to a death spiral of firing people into studio closure.

At smaller studio sizes of less than 100, one single studio in today’s market could easily be generating 10 games per year or more. But a publisher might have 20 or more studios. That’s 200+ games per year from just a single publisher. Now expand that to multiple publishers, and we haven’t even mentioned the infinite indie games that release each year. Games already get drowned out of sales and thats with AAA barely releasing a handful of games each year. It would be much harder to gain any marketshare if so many more games were released in just one year.

Truly a mystery even science cannot explain.

For this particular game I can only imagine physical sales were from gamblers that wanted a future collectible like E.T. Atari cartridges and actually predicted correctly.

Why? Then the devs you love would be controlled by investors and shareholders. You won’t be likely to get the games you love anymore.

AAA studios already have the ability to fix the problem, they just don’t want to:

• Fire more people to reduce studio size, there is no reason to have more than like 150 people, realistically
• Focus on smaller projects that can be developed faster
• Put all the game content in the game at launch
• Smaller game means less dev time and more and better bug fixing
• Make a fun game first, then decide the details

For some reason they think that retaining every single employee and developing impossibly huge games is more important though.

Yeah, I know it isn’t But even you must admit, our genre is dry as a desert. We take what we can get, even if it’s not exactly a flight sim it can be close enough to scratch the itch.

Well I guess the characters I listed are pretty different, and I watched Chobits and Goblin Slayer with time in between, same with playing Danganronpa 2, so maybe if I heard more of his roles I might have recognized his voice.

I never knew the Japanese VA for Hideki in Chobits was also the VA for both Lizardman in Goblin Slayer and Gundham Tanaka in Danganronpa. Thats crazy.

Theres that whole Star Wars Genesis total conversion mod that changes basically everything, yeah. I haven’t tried it myself yet, but it makes a lot of changes.

Though honestly if those are all your complaints, it seems like you don’t want to play the game regardless, whether its modded or not. You just want to play a completely different game. That’s like asking if adding various spices and switching different kinds of cheeses makes a Cheeseburger into a Lobster dinner.

Well, if you ignore mods maybe. But now there are a lot of mods that can fix everything. The problem is it is pretty time consuming to get all the mods set up and its not very user friendly to need to use mods from the start of the game.

Us space flight sim enjoyers like that kind of thing. When Starfield was announced we kinda expected it to be a default feature, so obviously when we saw it wasnt a feature it was disappointing.

Non-metallic paints are easier to get repaired as long as the paint code is matched exactly. Otherwise it can stick out if the paint is slightly off. Also usually needs a wet sand on the clearcoat because the orange peel almost never matches the factory orange peel.

Nardo Gray is a good color, and basically every car’s body lines are easily defined in the color. Its pretty hard to find a car that looks bad in Nardo Gray.

It originally was a special order color on the 2013 Audi RS7, and ever since has had various other manufacturers offering similar colors. It’s a bit like Grabber Blue, but since it is gray it has a little wider appeal.

Nintendo has basically always favored the Japanese market. This isn’t unexpected.

I dont mean to say something that supports eugenics., because I don’t.

Raising a child is way more complex than learning how to use a comupter. If a person has learning disabilities so severe that they cannot learn how to use a computer, then it would be wildly irresponsible for them to raise a child, because doing so is more complex. I am not saying that people with learning disabilities shouldn’t be allowed have children. That was never an argument.

My whole point was that there is basically no excuse to not be tech savvy these days, except for an extreme case which is exempt from the argument.

Not everyone has the ability to be tech savvy.

This is not true. Everyone has the ability to be tech savvy, except perhaps people with severe learning disabilities. Which, if that is the case, they shouldn’t be having children, thus making them irrelevant to this discussion. [EDIT: Apparently I have to edit this here because people are locking in on this singular sentence and misunderstanding this calling it an argument for eugencis. That is not the argument, and never was. My point was that it would be irresponsible to raise children if you cannot learn how to use a computer because raising a child is so much more complex. Thus “shouldn’t have children” in this context is the same as “shouldn’t cross the street” when a car is coming: you can, but it would be very irresponsible.]

People have to care enough to actually try to learn. Learning tech is not difficult. But too many people don’t care enough to want to even try. Because trying takes effort, and people these days only do whatever is easiest.

I mean, why actually parent your kid when you can sit them down in front of an iPad all day and make the government create laws that make businesses and schools responsible for raising them? Why take on the responsibility of your conscious choice to create a new human when you can just shove it all onto someone else who can take the blame when that inevitably fails? Kids take up your free time; why deal with that when you can drop them into the daycare called Roblox and then do whatever you actually wanted to do without needing to supervise your kid?

Additionally, sometimes you can’t have a certain kind of parental control on something, thats true. The solution? Either the kid can use it while the parent actively watches them, or they aren’t allowed to use it at all. Kid is visiting webpages they aren’t supposed to? DNS block those sites. RaspberryPi community might even have something like a PiHole but for blocking outgoing network traffic to certain URLs, or maybe even a PiHole might work for that, IDK. Everything has a work around, but there are ways to make things difficult for someone that isn’t eventually going to end up a computer science major.

Basically every Nintendo DS and 3DS game, to make them playable on a single screen with a regular controller.

I have a DS Lite and New 3DS XL (the Metroid edition), and I am over the touch screen. It gets scratched up, is discolored, and makes using the device annoying and uncomfortable because of its weight. Would much rather be able to play the games on a single screen without those elements. Yes, that would mean some heavy changes for some games, but I would consider it worthwhile.

Because playing games designed on CRTs on a modern TV and at modern resolutions is an objective visual downgrade in almost every single case, except for a tiny select few cases.