

They can make electric cars… e-bikes, trams, etc.
are you doing alright?
Autocorrect hates me, I am sorry.


They can make electric cars… e-bikes, trams, etc.
are you doing alright?


This feels too low.
Store count times times products times customers is way bigger than this
The economist, unlike most other newspapers, at least has a clear point of view, published on their page, and has a lot of expert writers.


Yeah, that seems to be what they do


I don’t know why this is a shitpost, I might try this this week


I need a home for my orphaned podman containers /s
I think this is better targeted to small and medium businesses.
if you run this as a NAS you could easily have all your budd s obsesses files in one place without needing complex networking.


Pterodactyl? Nessie?!
But I just watched Beyond Loch Ness and the cryptozoologist would not lie.
I’m okay. Haven’t drank any saviour schnapps, so feeling nervous.


That is so cool
You could buy a few of these, run them in RAID, and be able to store all of the mahority of businesses complete data on it.
All you need is an offsite backup and that solves so many problems that result in overpaying for cloud.


The last two years I started going to garage sales for DVDs/Blu Rays.
It’s been great. You can get like 5-10 movies for the price of a month of Netflix. Then you can sell them next spring for $5-10 and buy $5-10 worth from someone else of stuff you haven’t seen.


I really want to see this guy march alone with a single sign that says “Protect Billionaire Rights”
Billionaires have it the worst. people are always going “you could do this for the world,” “you could feed children,” but nobody is asking why they’re stuck with a single 300ft yacht when they really want that 400ft yacht with two helicopter pads.
Birds lay eggs
Everyone in the education system, at every level, is incentivized to inflate grades and pass more students.
When I was in university too many kids started failing the intro classes so they had to add additional mandatory intro classes that used to be covered at high school.
Government don’t want to pay teachers, teachers don’t want to get called out for failing kids who were under-equipped for their class, so they pass them, then the next year teacher has to do the same, or they look bad. The government adds standardized tests, which become the target, because that what will make the schools look bad. Then the colleges/universities want higher enrolment for more money. They don’t care what happens after kids graduate.
I think the answer is standardized testing needs to become more holistic, universities need to do entrance testing instead of relying on standardized tests, teachers need to get funded so they can teach kids instead of spending all their time dealing with a few problem students, and we need to let kids fail and re-introduce “streaming” teaching where smart kids can get into classes with smart kids, and unmotivated kids can get put into classes that refocus their learning and fix their fundamentals.
That first picture looks like a Mogwai that’s been fed after midnight. Wow
You’ve made a huge difference in that handsome guy’s life, amazing work!


I feel like for 15 years or more Apple has been putting their chess pieces on the board just-so for gaming.
Then when you think they’ll do something they just keep shuffling the pieces about and never do anything with it.


Apple’s ad network is by far the worst ad network I’ve ever seen. The ads are, and have always been, absolute shit.
Hopefully it means trivial 6 line functions just get written inline in your project.


I watched The Hunger Games.
If they made a one time exception for Peeta and Katniss to win together, why in the second film are all the pairs related? Like the morphlings, nerds, the brother and sister, etc.
and the statistician in me was kinda pissed every district has two winners for the quarter quell. That’s 25 years = 26 winners, but there are 24 contestants with two from each district? Even by random chance you’d expect one district to lose out.
I feel like Geri is just out of frame somewhere
I won’t disagree that it’s a paper for the wealthy, by the wealthy. But at least they’re honest about it and their biases.
https://www.economist.com/frequently-asked-questions