• woteorin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised. But, I suspect there’s also a factor of just implausibility. Apparently, the main vessel they use is “experimental”, so it may just literally be impossible to have a recovery vessel without being a literal government.

    My money’s on this being the result of someone ignoring the “hey, these are not good conditions” warnings.

      • jellyfish@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The bit with the contract is @ 2:40:

        An experimental submersible vessel that has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and could result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma or death.

        At least you can’t say they didn’t know what they were getting into. Still an awful way to go, if it did implode at depth, at least it’d be quick.

        • StringTheory@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think I’d rather implode and go instantly, than be floating on the surface for 4 days and unable to get out while slowly suffocating.

          Neither is my idea of a good time…

          • Pigeon@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can they not open a hatch if it’s on the surface?

            Water would be a problem still, but not suffocation, if so.

            • StringTheory@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nope. The hatch is bolted from the outside. They can’t do anything from the inside and are utterly dependent on someone outside with a power socket wrench to unscrew each of the 17 bolts holding the hatch on.

              There are some design flaws with this thing.