• Bonus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Did he though? Has anyone actually read this piece?

    He made a slight caveat. That’s it. It’s not political. It’s not at all “lamenting” about anything.

    “I know some of you may have strong feelings about this mission. That’s okay. You are citizens first, but you’re also service members who took an oath to support and defend the Constitution and follow the orders of the President and the Governor. That oath doesn’t come with an asterisk that says, “only when I agree with the mission.”

    “I’ll be honest with you — I know this isn’t easy. Some people in Oregon won’t understand or won’t support this mission. Some might even be hostile about it. But we’ve been through tough situations before. We are professionals who do our duties, regardless of how it’s received.”

    “Don’t post about unit movements, mobilization details, or operational information. Please don’t get into political arguments online while wearing the uniform or identifying yourself as a member of the Oregon Guard. Understand you represent something bigger than yourself, and the public is watching. Show them the professionalism I know you’re capable of.”

    Almost posted this myself til I realized the headline was bullshit. In fact, quite the opposite, this reads as browbeating, condescending, and insulting. Hardly a passionate expression of grief or sorrow, Ken Klippenstein.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah claiming that Oregonians “won’t understand” their mission quite clearly demonstrates that he’s on board with it. This is a roundabout way of saying that people are ignorant if they don’t support deploying the military against the populace.

      • Bonus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Definitely. He’s on board and appears to be counseling folks they need to do their mission whether it’s illegal or not.

    • xyzzy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think some folks here are reading this speech through the lens of their own narratives. I didn’t get that from this at all. It seems to me like he’s saying they need to uphold the Constitution and act like professionals, even if they disagree that they should be deployed or if Portlanders are angry with them.