• maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sentence is correct, but the article title sire does pussyfoot around the word rape.

    • Fisk400@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s the same problem as youtube. Words like rape and pedophile lowers ad value on the article.

    • cavemeat@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aw man, I didn’t notice until you pointed it out. Why is news media always so reluctant to say rape even when the rapist has been convicted?

      • gurmif@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        IMO, we need different words, just like we have different terms for murder (first degree second degree, manslaughter, etc). To me “rape” means “dragged violently into an alley and forcefully peenetrated”, not the myriad of other circumstances of questionable/lack of consent.

  • sometimescarmen@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reading the article suggests the mother of the child was complicit? Am I reading that right? If so, she should absolutely be charged as well.