Measuring America’s slide toward democratic erosion.
The crackdown on dissent and speech in Minnesota this winter follows a pattern that is common in countries that slide from democracy to autocracy: A leader enacts a legally dubious policy. Citizens protest that policy. The government responds with intimidation and force. When people are hurt, the government blames them and lies about what happened.
The New York Times editorial board published an index in October tracking 12 categories of democratic erosion, based on historical patterns and interviews with experts. Our index places the United States on a scale of 0 to 10 for each category. Zero represents the United States before President Trump began his second term — not perfect, surely, but one of the world’s healthiest democracies. Ten represents the condition in a true autocracy, such as China, Iran or Russia.
Edit: Adding the metrics that aren’t visible in the archived copy.
- Stifling speech and dissent 4/10
- Persecuting political opponents 5/10
- Bypassing the legislature 4/10
- Defying the courts 2/10
- Declaring false emergencies 5/10
- Using the military at home 2/10
- Vilifying marginalized groups 6/10
- Controlling information 2/10
- Trying to take over universities 2/10
- Creating a cult of personality 6/10
- Using power for personal profit 7/10
- Manipulating the law to stay in power 2/10
It kinda sucks that the sliders for their metrics didn’t carry over on the archive version, since without it the article is pretty empty.
I also find the title rage inducing. Yeah, it’s not exactly a surprise either. But still pretty fucked up when Minnesota showed (and continues to) something very powerful facing this shit, rather than just being part of the story. I’d argue their actions even hold weight against moving towards autocracy with in their little slider thingies.
Thanks. Good catch! I’ll add them to the post.
Thank you! :)