I know there’s donations and the owners can use their own money, but there’s a limit. I doubt a platform with hundreds of thousands of daily users can survive with only donations.

  • simple@lemmy.mywire.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    By having more instances and better user distribution. Running a small-ish instance isn’t very expensive, around 5-10 euro a month (some VPS providers are cheaper, etc). As Lemmy development continues, and more optimizations come in, these smaller lemmy instances will be able to support more users.

    There is also a discussion on GitHub to introduce user and community migrations between instances. So once that feature is implemented, it will be easier to redistribute everything across all Lemmy instances.

    • kiddblur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there a point where there are so many instances that propagating all that data is too taxing and worse than having fewer bigger instances?

      • PriorProject@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there a point where there are so many instances that propagating all that data is too taxing

        Yes, that becomes a concern as the network size grows and the amount of aggregate replication traffic increases. Mastodon has like 10x the server count of Lemmy, though… so that’s hopeful. They do use ActivityPub differently though, it possible that federation scales differently between them.

        This GitHub issue has a lot of good (but rough and high-level) thoughts on future scaling techniques: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3062