There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of “planned obsolescence”.

  • Gnubyte@lemdit.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    TLDR: I’m still very suspicious of how that is quantified - “leading to an overall better product”.

    Who quantifies that and how, on a case by case basis, especially in the form of Chromebooks or phones for revenant, popular examples?

    Let’s say it was a laptop: I can see issues with lithium batteries perhaps reaching a cycle count that lead them to be dangerous. Wouldn’t that mean though you should produce a good that has replaceable batteries? Is the battery designed in such a manner on purpose?

    Businesses with shareholders that live quarter to quarterly profit are the issue. There is no authoritarian legislator that reallocates resources like China did the last few years, for example, whether you like it or not.

    The US relies on legislation to be passed to mandate the changes or prohibit a device from being built a certain way. That legislation can be lobbied for loopholes, have various people in power also own percentages of the companies, etc. Whether you agree with it or not, there are many checks and balances and simultaneously a lack thereof.