• orc girly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    No, by good faith I meant willing to consider context, facts and understand the other side, even if you disagree at the end you’d end up sharpening your argumentation, instead you ask a rhetoric question and then refuse to engage with the answer we’d give you.

    • howmuchlonger@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      I already know what the link says. I already know your arguments. This isn’t my first time making that statement. There are zero things you can say that I haven’t already heard and there are zero things I can say to change your mind. I am as firm as you are.

      That’s not bad faith. That’s just not agreeing with you.

        • howmuchlonger@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          5 days ago

          Why? I don’t like talking to brick walls or being commanded to do things. That doesn’t my opinions are wrong. But we both know you’re not capable of considering another opinion… in good faith.

          • Calfpupa [she/her]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            If you cant summarize it you dont know the article, if you can’t refute it then your opinion doesn’t matter. One of the core aspects of Marxism is that your opinions change constantly over time (dialectics), it’s just that your points are incorrect and you can’t support them.