We get one of the two. When enough trees care to find an alternative, you’ll have a point. But saying both are unacceptable has yet to prevent one of the two.
So would you rather sacrifice fewer until we can figure out how to sacrifice none, or is the greater sacrifice acceptable because at least you can say you didn’t do it?
We get one of the two. When enough trees care to find an alternative, you’ll have a point. But saying both are unacceptable has yet to prevent one of the two.
So would you rather sacrifice fewer until we can figure out how to sacrifice none, or is the greater sacrifice acceptable because at least you can say you didn’t do it?
I would rather seek to violently destroy the axe and chainsaw, rather than help either.
Voting isn’t a solution to the problem.
Yes but until you can accomplish what you seek, we’re getting one of the two. Not helping either doesn’t stop them.
Voting isn’t a solution to the problem. It is a delay tactic to buy time necessary to develop and implement the solution.