Look ya’ll seem to love the % Hitler things so I’ll put it like this. The choices you see are 100% Hitler and 99.99999% Hitler, but ignore the several 0% Hitlers also standing there wanting votes and have plans on how not to be Hitler then get upset when people support 0% Hitler over 99.99999999% Hitler. Like I said, I view harm reduction as being 0 harm which means supporting 0% Hitler.
Considering the third party candidates available in the USA, there were no “0% Hitler” candidates, unless you only view some genocides as worth opposing.
I’m not upset that people support “0% Hitler”; I’m upset that people act like solipsistic morons when voting. If more people actually supported “0% Hitler” and they had a chance to win, this wouldn’t be a problem.
So how do you get more people to support 0% Hitler if you constantly publicly yell at the people who do?
“Don’t waste your vote on a candidate who is still polling under 1% in a race where there is a grotesquely worse candidate and a less-bad candidate both at near 50%” isn’t telling you “Don’t support 0% Hitler”, it’s telling you "Work on building support for 0% Hitler before you try to enter an election that requires a fucking plurality of the nation’s population to agree with your choice."
And and yes there was a 0% Hitler choice in the race
I’m sorry that you don’t think Ukrainians and Uyghurs are human beings, but unsurprising given your positions thus far.
Look ya’ll seem to love the % Hitler things so I’ll put it like this. The choices you see are 100% Hitler and 99.99999% Hitler, but ignore the several 0% Hitlers also standing there wanting votes and have plans on how not to be Hitler then get upset when people support 0% Hitler over 99.99999999% Hitler. Like I said, I view harm reduction as being 0 harm which means supporting 0% Hitler.
Considering the third party candidates available in the USA, there were no “0% Hitler” candidates, unless you only view some genocides as worth opposing.
I’m not upset that people support “0% Hitler”; I’m upset that people act like solipsistic morons when voting. If more people actually supported “0% Hitler” and they had a chance to win, this wouldn’t be a problem.
So how do you get more people to support 0% Hitler if you constantly publicly yell at the people who do?
And and yes there was a 0% Hitler choice in the race
“Don’t waste your vote on a candidate who is still polling under 1% in a race where there is a grotesquely worse candidate and a less-bad candidate both at near 50%” isn’t telling you “Don’t support 0% Hitler”, it’s telling you "Work on building support for 0% Hitler before you try to enter an election that requires a fucking plurality of the nation’s population to agree with your choice."
I’m sorry that you don’t think Ukrainians and Uyghurs are human beings, but unsurprising given your positions thus far.
Considering Biden armed and supported Israel WAY more than Ukraine I wouldn’t say he or Harris view them as people either.
The only true way for people to see mass support for a good candidate is voting for them in the general. Bad choices don’t deserve a single vote.
You really don’t remember, do you.
Yes, we get it, you believe Ukrainians and Uyghurs deserve it and that apologia for genocide is a good choice rather than a bad one.
You wanna show me where he did this for Ukraine?
I find it hilarious that you cite an article that literally discusses aid numbers by the Biden administration for both Israel and Ukraine.
But I guess if you could read, you wouldn’t be a bootlicker.
I’m still wondering how anything you’ve been saying is any better than some rando saying Dems deserve a bullet.