Wouldn’t grow something from the inside require a very strong force to “move” the already present one? Instead growing from the last “layer” towards the outside would require a lot less force, but perhaps a lot more matter.

Is it even correct that trees grow concentrically?

Now that I think about it, how do plants grow in general? Hahaha

Update: for everyone wondering, yes, my question doesn’t make sense because the i.e. contradicts the question. I don’t want to correct it because I don’t know which part to correct since I was wrong, I thought trees grew new parts inside and pushed older parts outside. So I could correct the i.e. and swap “innemost” with “outermost” but that would mean that people would read a question stating something that is wrong, or I could correct the question and swap “inside” with “outside” but I was wrong and I’m glad I learnt something today. We can all agree that I asked a weird question in a weird way, thank you all for your answers.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    well i’d say that trees grow in both ways: the stem grows on the outside because it’s acting more like our bones, but the bark acts like our skin and indeed grows in the same way, new matter being created at the base and pushed outwards, hence why a lot of bark has tons of cracks in them from the stretching.