• Masimatutu@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Nobody is saying that desires are not based on anything, that would be quite silly. It’s just that if you redefine free will in terms of desire instead of some metaphysical independence you might get a more useful definition.

      • Masimatutu@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not quite, agency is to what degree someone acts to their own “moral judgement” (an unuseful term in my opinion, since it is a social construct), rather than desires.

          • Masimatutu@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The opposite of determinism is called metaphysical libertarianism iirc.

            The definition of free will is obviously very tricky even among compatibilists, and depending on who you ask you will get very different answers. But usually yes, there are no absolutes, as there are always many factors involved in making decisions, and personal interests (however you might define them) will be different proportions of that.