• Xariphon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Seriously. I gave it an honest shot, but it feels like nothing but an anemic shadow of 3.5.

        Like. I played 3.5 when it was new and had almost nothing in it, and there was still more in it than there is in 5e.

          • Xariphon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’ve never tried PF2e. 1e changed a lot from 3.5 in ways I strongly disliked, so I never really played much of it or tried 2e.

            • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              2e and the three action economy, meaningful class balance, meaningful movement, and solid rules make it my go to.

              I haven’t played 5e but I haven’t found anything in it so far pf2e doesn’t seem to.do better.

              Certainly I’m liking DMing for it.

        • GTG3000@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s a really good way to get people into tabletop, since making characters is very straightforward and there’s not much they need to remember.

          …three campaigns later, I yearn for PF2e though.