Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says he knows the same young voters who propelled him to office are frustrated, but that he will double down on the work he’s been doing.

  • Yardy Sardley@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Time to pull out that electoral reform idea you’ve had in your back pocket for the last 8 years.

    Seriously, if there was ever a time for something like that, it’s now. The CPC seems poised to take a landslide victory in the next election. We might be able to avoid that looming disaster by making a vote against Trudeau not equate to a vote for polievre.

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You assume they want electoral reform at all

      They don’t.

      They’d rather lose now and keep the system that would net them another majority of seats (without a majority of votes) in the future, then implement a system that would see them never realize another majority ever again.

      The Liberals would rather lose every seat in Parliament and be reduced to zero than implement real electoral reform.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would be a great time - especially knowing there’s a slim chance that he’ll win the next election. Instead of handing out country over to an insane christian bag of hot air, implement a voting system that might pass the vote over to somebody else.

    • BringMeTheDiscoKing@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nobody is ‘poised’ to do anything. The next election doesn’t need to happen until the back end of 2025. Thats more than enough time for the Liberals to do what they do best and convince everyone that, bad as they are, they’re the only safe choice.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some countries actually have politcal debates about the positives a leader will bring rather than the negatives the oposition will. Some countries have even had leaders step down when their policies left their politicians or citezens too divided.

            • BringMeTheDiscoKing@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              True. Things have gotten worse, though. I remember being fairly shocked by the first Harper campaign, the depths they went to amplify anger towards the Liberal party. To be fair, the Liberals had it coming and needed to be replaced, but they needed to be replaced by the Tories, not the Reform party (which is what the Conservative party was and is)

    • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not convinced it’s a landslide. I don’t think PP is winning the female vote. He’s not winning the Toronto vote either, so this is already starting to get pretty murky. You can’t lose both and have a bonafide path to majority. So who is going to prop them up, the NDP?

      • Yardy Sardley@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a reasonable take, and I hope with all my heart it turns out that way. At the same time, I think it would be a mistake to underestimate the effectiveness of the “axe the tax” rhetoric. People are willing to overlook a lot of dubious political behaviour if they think it will make a them a couple of bucks.