lumpenproletariat@quokk.auM to Memes of Production@quokk.auEnglish · 2 months agomanufacturing distractionquokk.auexternal-linkmessage-square77linkfedilinkarrow-up1144arrow-down11
arrow-up1143arrow-down1external-linkmanufacturing distractionquokk.aulumpenproletariat@quokk.auM to Memes of Production@quokk.auEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square77linkfedilink
minus-squareMrNobody@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·2 months agoChomsky is paid opposition, to deliver a softer message. He was also friend with Epstein.
minus-squaretangentism@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 months agoAnd Chomsky admitted that he didn’t have much of a hand in writing it either
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 months agowait hang on, i thought we were discrediting the book
minus-squaretangentism@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoThat fact doesn’t exactly add any credibility to it and just underlines it was promoted over Parenti superior work by attaching the nonces best pals name to it
minus-squarewyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agononce’s*, pal’s*🙇🏼♂️
minus-squareSailorMoss@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoGenuine question, what is the evidence that he was paid opposition?
minus-squarepunkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months ago Chomsky is paid opposition I would like to know too. Having bad takes and not the most radical analysis doesnt make one paid opposition. There is a reddit thread that discusses a longer article that tries to proof that exact statement and IMO fails doing exactly that.
Chomsky is paid opposition, to deliver a softer message. He was also friend with Epstein.
And Chomsky admitted that he didn’t have much of a hand in writing it either
wait hang on, i thought we were discrediting the book
That fact doesn’t exactly add any credibility to it and just underlines it was promoted over Parenti superior work by attaching the nonces best pals name to it
nonce’s*, pal’s*🙇🏼♂️
Genuine question, what is the evidence that he was paid opposition?
I would like to know too. Having bad takes and not the most radical analysis doesnt make one paid opposition. There is a reddit thread that discusses a longer article that tries to proof that exact statement and IMO fails doing exactly that.