• Katlah@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Hm yes if we inefficiently use all this space then we can destroy all this perfectly good agricultural land and make space for more cars!”

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      What’s inefficient about vertical farming? There’s plenty of green area even in the Picture that’s posted, could easily put a bike and pedestrian network through there. If it was needed.

      There’s always solutions, but it’s also just easier to bitch and moan instead.

      • eatfudd@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        What’s inefficient about vertical farming?

        Cost. It’s a lot more expensive to build vertical. Additionally you need lighting that would wouldn’t need otherwise.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The capacity more than makes up for it. You could also grow in cold climates where you can’t normally as well.

          The benefits are there.

          • eLJay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, it’s just like solar. You need existing infrastructure to make it worthwhile, e.g. the top, sides, or inside of an apartment building . Otherwise there would be vertical farms everywhere. America is entrepreneur/Venture capital heavy. If it penciled out properly, people would be doing it.