• vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      it is now provably not secure. Because pos is provably not objective. Making the whole thing moot. Also, it is literally a system explicitly designed around “the rich get richer”.

          • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Even if it is (I don’t see your reasoning explaining that) that doesn’t mean the resulting security scheme is objective.

    • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Isn’t ethereum a centralised shit coin with a money printer attached, controlled by the owners of the “foundation?”

      • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        In what way is Ethereum centralized?
        The owers of ETH contribute to the consensus.
        How would the foundation control any of that?
        Mybe you confuse Ethereum with IOTA?