• Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      New Hampshire having a state law that they always get to go first, for a national election, that’s been around for 100 years, is dumb as fuck.

      It’s good this change is happening. The primary orders should shuffle around more often. No state declaring “we’re always first” within their state laws should be recognized at the federal level.

      • Null User Object@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Here’s a crazy idea. Every state has their primary on the same day so that no state gets to dictate who others get to vote for.

        Here’s an even crazier idea. Ditch primaries altogether and use Ranked Choice Voting.

        I’m sick and tired of other people deciding which lesser evils I’m allowed to choose between long before my turn to vote even comes around.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          They should let the most populated states go first. I’m tired of having our votes count for nothing because half the candidates have already dropped out by the time they get to us, even though we outnumber the people in all the states that go before us. Those early wins and losses would really mean something if they represented a large and diverse population. Might make up a little for how underrepresented we are in the Electoral College.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You as an individual are under-represented, but you as a populous state are too powerful. If California primaries first , no one else matters.

            When New Hampshire primaries first, you get a lot of meeting the candidates, an interesting survey result, but the result is still wide open.

            Either way, it’s all of us in the middle who get shafted. We don’t get an early say but our vote doesn’t count for much with the big guys coming soon.

            I’m torn about whether it is good to be a “safe”state. While it’s nice that we don’t get the nonsense or the robocalls or the mail or the ads, would it hurt to get some attention? Can we be treated like we matter?