A growing number of Americans are ending up homeless as soaring rents in recent years squeeze their budgets.

According to a Jan. 25 report from Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies, roughly 653,000 people reported experiencing homelessness in January of 2023, up roughly 12% from the same time a year prior and 48% from 2015. That marks the largest single-year increase in the country’s unhoused population on record, Harvard researchers said.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    It wasn’t anything like coordinated rent increases from large groups of landlords using a pricing app

    Which Biden has no interest in doing anything about. Why isn’t he using the bully pulpit to name and shame enemies of his administration?

    it wasn’t a worldwide pandemic disrupting the market,

    It’s been years since you and the rest of Democrats gave a shit about COVID, so it’s hypocritical to blame the ongoing pandemic.

    Perhaps if Biden didn’t give up entirely on public health then the ongoing economic problems caused by COVID could be addressed, but instead we don’t even talk about it like it’s still a serious issue and ignore the ongoing wave of deaths. We are still having excess deaths far above the pre-pandemic period, but I bet you don’t even wear a mask to the store. What a joke.

    it wasn’t America keeping housing as an investment vehicle instead of a means of sheltering humans, it wasn’t decades of wealthy investors buying housing to convert into rentals.

    Both problems are something Biden helped establish over his long tenure as a Senator.

    Nope, all of that complexity can be tossed out the window because one single man is to blame: Joe Biden.

    Liberals in every country do this thing where they use complexity as a way to mystify and obscure the consequences of their party’s actions and inaction. Somehow the President is powerless and problems come from nowhere. No one is to blame, except maybe the red team.

    • fenynro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s interesting to see the assumptions and projections you put onto me. All I’ve said (or implied snarkily) is that the housing and homelessness crisis that we’re seeing in America is a multifaceted issue, and much larger than trying to simply blame one man.

      For what it’s worth, I have no love for Biden and think he could be doing a hell of a lot more from his position, as could the rest of the corporate Democrat party, as could literally any Republican with a spine, but unfortunately we’re stuck with a party that won’t act and a party whose only purpose is to block the other.

      I still don’t think you can distill the housing issue down to just ‘Biden bad’ though, so you should really do some introspection and see if your anger towards Biden might be blurring your viewpoint a little bit

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Consider that, maybe, the assumptions and projections that you put on to me. When did I say Biden is to blame for everything? When did I actually distill the housing issue down to just ‘Biden bad’ except by glibly mocking their PR teams attempt to spin good economic news as “Bidenomics”. Remember, they’re the ones that made up that term. I was just referencing it.

        • fenynro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          When did I say Biden is to blame for everything?

          I mean, sure, you didn’t type that exact sentence but when you provided an itemized list of why Biden is to blame for each item in my original comment, it’s not a huge leap of logic to think you blame Biden for these things.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            I was just listing things Biden played a role in. Things he is partially to blame for, because he has not done everything he can to fight back.

            Obviously he’s not the king of America and can’t just be blamed for everything, but I refuse to just say he’s blameless because of that.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you think you make any sort of sense with this way of writing? You are slamming Biden because you don’t know who is a actually responsible. It’s greedy landlords and the corporate overlords that run housing.

      Biden runs the country. Not the whole housing market. If anything he helped it with his administration relieving college debt and made it more affordable to many Americans that don’t need to pay off debt.

      You make zero points and I just throwing mud to make Trump the only choice.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Biden runs the country. Not the whole housing market.

        He definitely could interfere with the housing market to a much higher degree. He could also make better use of the bully pulpit to attack greedy landlords and corporate housing by name.

        He will not.

        When Trump wins he will make everything worse and Biden is doing everything he can to make sure he loses.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          He could also make better use of the bully pulpit to attack greedy landlords and corporate housing by name.

          Biden: “You landlords are terrible and charge too much! Here are your names!”

          Landlords: “Cool. How are you going to be able to stop us?”

          Biden: “…”

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Landlords: “Cool. How are you going to be able to stop us?”

            He supposedly loves unions, right? How about he starts throwing his support behind tenant unions and rent strikes? How about he tells the millions of Democrats to take political and economic actions against landlords and real estate companies? “Here are your enemies and these are their companies, you know what to do.”

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think you may be misunderstanding who has all the money and all the high-priced lawyers in this equation.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                Bosses have money and high-priced lawyers, workers can beat them anyway. A strong tenant union can beat a landlord just the same.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Yeah, okay. The last time I lived in an apartment building, there were six tenants. If we had tried to form a union, we would have just been kicked out because we lived in a desirable area of L.A. and he could have charged new tenants more. Should we have added ourselves to the record number of homeless so this plan of yours can come to fruition? How about all the people in single-occupancy dwellings that are renting? Should they form a tenant union of one? Do you think that would work?

                  It’s like you think every renter lives in a high-rise.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    It’s like you think the wider national union wouldn’t bother to help a little group of six tenants. You’re basically arguing we shouldn’t bother with labor unions because not everyone works in a factory.

                    If your six neighbors joined a union to collectively bargain, it wouldn’t be a union of six people! You’d just be one small part of the broader union, which has the resources to hire lawyers and pressure the landlord.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          You can what if all day long. And it’s not fact. It’s fantasy. So you don’t make sense in two posts. Keep going. Your whole account can look like a lost soul in a cult.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            A cult of what? I’m just criticizing Biden! You seem to think the president is powerless and nothing that has gone wrong is his fault.

            Is there literally anything you would criticize him for?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                So you’re hostile to outsiders and blindly support Blue Leader no matter what?

                Remember, I never told anyone how to vote. If someone wants to vote for Biden that is their business and I completely understand it. You, on the other hand, attack anyone who even criticizes Biden.

                Sounds like I’m not the one in a cult. Good luck Blue MAGA

                • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  No. I’m not going to engage with someone with their head so far up their keester they don’t know how to discuss things to make sense. You never make any points other than pure speculation and are actively trying to muddy the water because you support Trump and don’t want to admit it. Your whole account is soley to bolster votes for your cult.

                  So keep doing it. And I’ll keep not caring. And neither will all the other people that are lurking and reading how little sense you make with what ifs and could haves.

                  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I’m not going to engage with someone with their head so far up their keester they don’t know how to discuss things to make sense.

                    That statement/opinion is not intellectually honest.

                    You may disagree with the opinions she’s expressing, but she’s expressing them well, and they are worthy of debate/discussion.

    • stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Both parties are neolibs.

      It’s just a duopoly.

      All of your critiques apply to both parties.

      I’m left so I hate right.

      I’m right so I hate left.

      So boring.

      Introduce ranked choice voting.

      We could hate omnidirectionally.

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Introduce ranked choice voting.

        Out of curiosity, why do people write things like that? There’s 0% change of this happening. Are you delusional and propose this as actual solution or are you so disillusioned that at this point you don’t even care about actual solutions and just want to play fantasy politics?

        • iain@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, why do people propose minor improvements to this rotten system. People should just be content with their lot in life! How dare they have hope?!

          • ExLisper@linux.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Changing the electoral system would be a minor improvement? So you’re talking about some city level elections or do you actually think that changing how presidents and representatives are elected would only be a minor change?

            • iain@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              On the scale of doing nothing to socialist revolution, this is a pretty minor change. But I’d love to hear some improvements that are not fantasies. Or do we just have to give up?

              • ExLisper@linux.community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                On a scale from doing nothing to revolution convincing the elite to willingly relax their absolute grip on power and let other people win elections is like an 8. It’s not going to happen.

                What are some improvements that are not fantasies? I would say the actually possible thing would be to get a slightly more progressive president that would push through some meaningful reforms despite Republicans bitching about it. Education reform, justice system reform, immigration reform could all be possible Of course this is not happening in the next 5 years if ever.

                Supreme court reform is less possible but still achievable IMHO. Things like term limits and some real ethical oversight. Most people understand how corrupt it is and would support some changes. It would affect both parties equally so some bipartisan deal could be possible. Of course this is not getting enough tracking right now to move anywhere.

                Any form of constitutional reform on the other hand is not possible and is pure political fiction.

                • stembolts@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  It has already been introduced in various places. In those places there was someone, just as you are doing now, declaring it was impossible. Then it occurred.

                  Doom and gloom is easy, you see yourself win all the time because the conditions for victory are nothing happening. Hope is hard and full of heartbreak. I chose a hard outlook, but I can understand why you would choose an easy one.

                  • ExLisper@linux.community
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I don’t live in US so for it’s not a matter of hope or gloom. It’s just my opinion based on what I see happening there. I know a lot of Americans would like the entire Internet to cheer them and lie to give them some hope but I just don’t see much sense in that. If you think it’s achievable than do you, fight for it. I was just wandering if people really believe they can get it.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Introduce ranked choice voting.

        This!

        We could hate omnidirectionally.

        Not so much, this. Hate is bad, hate leads to destruction (Dark Side, etc).

        We should ALL be asking our politicians about ranked choice voting. It’s not even mentioned currently by anyone though.