The federal judiciary’s new rules target “judge shopping.” That’s terrible news for Matthew Kacsmaryk and other partisan judges.

Plaintiffs hoping to reshape federal or state policies will no longer be allowed to choose which judge will hear their case, at least in federal court. A new policy announced Tuesday by the Judicial Conference of the United States, a government body that sets policy for federal courts, targets rules in some federal courts that the conference said “risked creating an appearance of ‘judge shopping.’”

At least in the short term, this policy is a massive victory for the Biden administration — and, indeed, for anyone who believes that federal and state policies should not rise and fall based on one outlier judge’s partisan views.

Texas’s Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, for example, has been very aggressive in bringing lawsuits that challenge Biden administration policies before right-wing judges who have then issued sweeping, nationwide orders blocking those policies — sometimes on highly dubious grounds that are reversed, months later, by the Supreme Court.

  • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yes, 45s classified documents case is being handled by the legal equivilent of the three kids in a trench coat, that he appointed to the district his cases would be heard in. Between the mishandling of evidence, accidental release of the names of wittnesses and inability to stick to established protocol, im amazed they havent been thrown off the case or disbarred.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re giving “Judge” Cannon way more benefit of the doubt than she deserves. Everything she’s done has been calculated and deliberate to torpedo the case and help Trump.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        There is no benefit of doubt from me, the problem is that the judicial system is hesitant to punish one of their own. Expecially when the most recent appointees are on-board with the malpractice. Hanlon’s razor is how I normally try to view things and it is deeply concerning that it does not apply here.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      And that’s after she’s already (clearly erroneously) ruled in Trump’s favor in a previous case. It’s absurd that they were able to get her again.