Open source printer with refillable ink, no bullshit, accept rolls of papers.

Finally an open source printer ! I dealt with so much stupidity with printers. it warm my heart.

I do have too much joy to practice mandatory critical thinking about the release of a new project. Lets talk about it? i am not the only one to be happy about it, i have no info about the price though :/

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Certainly a cool idea, and I hope it succeeds and turns out to be what it seems.

    No price listed on their crowd fund page, so who can say what this might cost? Uses a Raspberry Pi Zero W for the brains and a STM32 for the cartridge board.

    • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      While I understand why are they unwilling to allow commercial usage of the final product, it also makes it difficult to actually put in the hands of people. I agree, hopefully they can reconsider for a later iteration.

      • warmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        If it’s not really FOSS, It’s just an attention grabbing, open washing failure in progress, sponsored by people who don’t understand the licensing implications.

        • adarza@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          i do enjoy the fact they’re repurposing hp cartridges. but if this printer thing actually grabs some traction, i can totally see hp EOLing every printer that uses them and ending new production of those cartridges.

          • Starkon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Maybe by then openprinter would have migrated to their ink standard and started producing it. Old models’ ink cartridges can still be refilled but not changed.

        • BeatL@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I do understand your passion and i respect your disappointment.

          While i understand the explicit implications of cc-by-nc-sa, (attribution, non-commercial,share alike) i fail to understand the implicits implications. Could i trouble you to explain it ?

          • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I think the criticism is that it’s less likely to build an ecosystem like a Gnu Public License would (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RepRap for an example of a 3d printer that very successfully used the GPL). The CC license prevents large corporations from stealing the design. But it also prevents someone from 3D-printing parts and selling them on a small ebay store.

            Seeing the dissembled printer makes me want it regardless of license tbh