Most screen readers never look at the rendered screen. Instead, they get information from the browser in two ways.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    True story time: My mother had a brain tumour removed that would’ve killed her. A side effect of surgery was that she’s now blind in one eye. It would’ve been impossible to remove the tumour and save her without also damaging her eye because of where the tumour was. Was the doctors’ intention to blind her?

    • 🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦A
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It is possible, at some future date, that a less invasive method (nanotechnology? Lasers? who cares.) could be invented for cases like your mother’s. It is not possible, at any future date, for a technology to block AI but not block screen readers. Because it can no more exist than you can have water that isn’t wet.

        • 🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦A
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Of course there is. If you dump a bucket of water on your head, you intend to get wet. There is absolutely nothing else that could possibly happen. If you intend to block machines from reading your content, machines will be unable to read your content. Screen readers are machines. There is absolutely nothing else that could possibly happen.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            If I’m on fire, I intend to not be on fire. Wetness is the side effect. For something to be a side effect and uninteded, it doesn’t matter if it’s inevitable.