• FireTower@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree with the overall idea, but this wasn’t one judge it was the majority (4-3).

    Even when all parties do the best we can reasonably expect on occasion a bone will slip through. But when that happens and someone suffers injury because of it they deserve restitution if they specifically ordered a boneless product.

    The court didn’t look at the breach of warranty claim. Which was probably the best argument in this case.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You again seem to be ignoring the fact it wasn’t really a bone fragment. It was an inch and a half long bone piece. There are entire bone-in wings that size. That’s not something anyone would expect in a boneless wing.

      Is there a reason you seem to be intentionally ignoring that detail?

      • FireTower@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Again? This is the first I’ve replied to you. I think you misunderstood my position.

        My only issue was with you claiming it was one judge not four.