ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agoUS Supreme Court declines to halt Trump's sentencing in hush money case.www.voanews.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1516arrow-down17
arrow-up1509arrow-down1external-linkUS Supreme Court declines to halt Trump's sentencing in hush money case.www.voanews.comModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareSteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·edit-22 months ago the newspaper for respectable republicans I agree with a lot your critique of WaPo but it is not favored by republicans at all. Centrist/center-left democrats 100%
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·edit-21 month agoYeah, if I wanted a paper as a capitalist/conservative symbol, I’d use the WSJ. Anyway, MBFC is garbage and this bot is actively harmful.
minus-squareTransient Punk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·1 month agoYou should make a better bot :)
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·1 month agoA bot for what? Just posting a comment every time saying “consider the source” or something? Because there is no truly unbiased evaluation of sources.
minus-squareThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoBut TV and movies disagree with you so you’re wrong
I agree with a lot your critique of WaPo but it is not favored by republicans at all. Centrist/center-left democrats 100%
Yeah, if I wanted a paper as a capitalist/conservative symbol, I’d use the WSJ.
Anyway, MBFC is garbage and this bot is actively harmful.
You should make a better bot :)
A bot for what? Just posting a comment every time saying “consider the source” or something? Because there is no truly unbiased evaluation of sources.
But TV and movies disagree with you so you’re wrong