A former BioWare employee says that EA’s new management wasn’t on board with the developer’s inclusiveness.

  • Carmakazi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yes. That doesn’t inherently mean they’re endeavoring to implement Sharia in the games EA puts out.

      • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        “Okay I know ICE has been executing people publicly and it’s been on video, but that doesn’t mean immigration control in the US is getting more extreme.”

        “okay I know Russian military assets are building up along the Ukranian border and they’re getting tons of aircraft ready and moving troops and armor across the country, but that doesn’t inherently mean they’re going to start something.”

        “okay I know that bridge is actively in the process of crumbling and a chunk the size of a bus just crushed my car, but that doesn’t inherently mean it’s not safe to drive on”

    • 0ops@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      All this tells me is that you didn’t even make it through the headline

      • Carmakazi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Nowhere did they mention factually that SA requested this, as much as they tried to imply it by front loading the article with their acquisition of EA and the Sims cover business.

        Without some sort of public statement or leak, it’s hearsay. Them meddling is plausible, but so is management feeling pressured of their own volition, or just one manager being an ass.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Why did they buy EA then? So they could NOT make games? So they could close everything down and go out of business?

      • Carmakazi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Survival. They know the death of the petrostate is inevitable and that they need to diversify their investments while they still have the cash to do so. EA is just one of many, many assets their sovereign wealth fund picked up across a number of industries but leaning towards “tech” in general. From this perspective, I don’t see why they would be motivated to involve themselves more than knowing what they pull in.

        Do you seriously think they did this in an effort to win some sort of Islamic cultural victory over the degenerate west? If anything they’re looking to dump it all for AI investment now, like everyone else.

        • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Do you seriously think they did this in an effort to win some sort of Islamic cultural victory over the degenerate west?

          Not even remotely. Nobody brought this up except you in your first comment. I guess my question is why do YOU think that WE think that the UAE bought EA to implement sharia law?? Where did you hear that from?

          And yes, I get the “diversification” angle. That makes sense. But wouldn’t that mean they would have to… keep making games? And based on the past censorship needed to sell games in the UAE wouldn’t it stand to reason they would want that same level of censorship in games they make themselves? They aren’t doing it to “secretly prime people to accept sharia law” but simply because not censoring the games would be against their beliefs?

          That’s more the vibe I was getting from people commenting about it.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Do you seriously think buying EA with Jared Kushner is a backup plan to oil? Do you really think EA has enough growth potential to offset oil?

          • Fluke@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Missing the point.

            Straight answer: no.

            However, as one of many diversification options it’ll likely make more money than it cost(s), ergo…

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              If it were that simple, we would be here in the comments section of news about how EA forced the removal of the LGBTQ Pride Flag. The world isn’t run my logical people. It’s run by pedophiles, economic fanatics, religious fanatics, and narcissists. Everything’s getting worse because people in power are deciding to make things worse.

    • solipsisticskeptic@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Are you aware of anything happening? Like, at all? Other than what you’re spoonfed by conservative talking heads, of course

    • bold_omi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      In case the comment to which I am replying gets deleted, it said:

      Yes. That doesn’t inherently mean they’re endeavoring to implement Sharia in the games EA puts out.