• John Socks@socks.masto.host
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    @stabby_cicada @UsernameHere I’m afraid I take the darkest view. That is that BP etc gave the public the full option to care about their carbon footprint, and the public decided not to.

    At that point why should BP or politicians force it upon them?

    Who exactly would be the “we” in that process who knows better? If it is some informed and passionate minority, that is not actually democracy.

    It is a collective action failure.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Think of it like this - companies are contaminating everything with lead, because it’s slightly cheaper for them

      People get concerned for good reason

      So some companies pay to make lead free products and sell them at a premium. They put it all over the packaging

      Other companies see this, and start putting it on their packaging, despite still having an unsafe lead content

      All of them do media campaigns and lobby the government, further confusing the issue

      People need to buy food, and are working with limited information. They don’t have the time to educate themselves over every purchase - you’d need experts dedicated to testing and compiling the data

      So, for the good of everyone (the companies included) we made that. You can go to the grocery store and buy food, confident it doesn’t contain large amounts of lead.

      People definitely care, but systematic problems can only be solved systematically