“This is a collapse of the Democratic Party.” Consumer advocate, corporate critic and former presidential candidate Ralph Nader comments on the reelection of Donald Trump and the failures of the Democratic challenge against him.

Despite attempts by left-wing segments of the Democratic base to shift the party’s messaging toward populist, anti-corporate and progressive policies, says Nader, Democrats “didn’t listen.” Under Trump, continues Nader, “We’re in for huge turmoil.”

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    You should be saying: “Fuck Kamala Harris”

    The Dems knew from day one that the economy was the most important issue to voters, because the vast majority of them are working 2-3 jobs just to barely make ends meet.

    So what did they do? They ran a clearly brain-damaged candidate, and when he imploded on live national TV, they subbed in Harris, who spent two months just telling people suffering to be joyful, as if it weren’t only condescending, but terribly bad policy and campaign strategy. Here in Missouri the $15 minimum wage passed overwhelmingly, but Harris decided to cosplay as a moderate Republican and talk about tax cuts that no one actually thought she’d follow through with anyway, because they’ve spent the last four years being ignored by Joe Biden.

    And they kept harping on Trump’s weirdness, as if they haven’t already observed that voters do not care how weird he is.

    Jill Stein and Ralph Nader didn’t make these crappy political decisions.

    The Dems did.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Kamala Harris would not even be an issue if Nader hadn’t spoiled the 2000 election.

      Because Gore would have been president and everything would have been different.

      So no, fuck Ralph Nader.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Gore lost because George Bush’s brother, Jeb, invalidated a bunch of ballots and stopped a recount as governor of Florida.

        Besides that, this argument is absurd as it would be just as valid to say that Gore spoiled the election for Nader and if Gore hadn’t run, Nader would have been elected president instead of George W.

        Quit trying to externalize the blame for the actions of the party leadership. These faults should have been clear to you in 2016 when they handed the White House to Trump, and again in 2020 when their candidate only narrowly defeated Trump (especially at a time when Trump had already wrecked the economy and COVID was skyrocketing and this was fresh on everyone’s mind).

        You seem to keep insisting that everyone else needs to adjust to meet you in backing candidates that keep losing when maybe you should be the one adjusting to meet others. Sliding further and further right isn’t a winning strategy for Dems and that should be quite obvious by now.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Gore lost by few enough votes that there are a multitude of people who could have acted differently to produce a win. You can pick and choose who you want to blame and everyone is right.

      • dank@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        And if Adam didn’t eat the apple, we’d all be lounging naked in paradise.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          So you’re comparing something that literally happened within the lifetime of most people here with something that’s totally fictional?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              2000 is ancient history to you?

              Just how old are you?

              Also, since you seem to think Adam and Eve counts as history, I think I understand why reality is an issue for you.