• w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    30 days ago

    I see a lot of negativity in the comments. And yeah, this thing probably isn’t something I’m going to get, but at least they are trying something that isn’t a generic rectangle of glass like all the others. I miss the days of fun gadgets.

  • justblackcoffeeplease@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    Hopefully gphoto2 will run in this. It would make a less bulky intervalometer than the one I built with a raspberry pi and an attachable display.

  • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ooof. After having a pinephone, I know what 2 or 3GB of RAM can handle these days. Not much, really. Specially the moment you open the browser. I’m going to pass from any project that doesn’t attempt to at least get close to this decade’s standards.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      My current Android phone has 4GB and it’s really smooth. I’ve got 90 Firefox tabs open and several apps. I’d love to see that level of optimization in a startup, but more RAM will just mask the bad optimization.

      • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        I think you’re checking the Pro model. This one has a more powerful CPU and more RAM, and would have been a better option, except it had miserable failures to get it to boot or control the battery on launch, and development has been much slower than on the normal Pinephone, which although is woefully underpowered, it launched earlier and had a bigger support base. Pinephone Pro, while on paper being more powerful, stayed unusuable for rather long. I actually have both, and I haven’t checked recently to see if the Pro is any better these days. The normal one while having a much better compatibility (a lot of things worked with very little troubleshooting), RAM was seriously an Achilles heel, and you’d notice it the moment you opened Firefox or attempted to launch waydroid.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can I just send you five years worth of „we’re sorry we’re behind schedule” messages and then ghost you instead? If so send me $159

  • dink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I feel like it’s almost too generic to be useful. All the “standard” attachments make it a thing that already exists (and those things are usually much stable and supported). If they get enough 3rd party attention prior to launch, that could change.

    I wish they would have spent the time and effort just committing to the smartphone idea. Linux and the Linux community could greatly benefit from more open source smartphone devices.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would really love a return to a concept where you have a tablet that docks into a full size laptop form factor. Even better if the dock can have a graphics card.

  • als@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve learned not to get my hopes up with kickstarters but I’ll keep an eye on this one

    • phanto@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m still too dumb to learn… Ask me about my OKPad! In fact, ask me for my OKPad. Please, take the god awful thing off my hands!

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ok… I’ll bite…but for me to take it off your hands I’ll need to get a $50 deposit, and another $100 due after it’s arrived to me, you can pay shipping and duties as well…

  • plm00@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m intrigued. And although I read the article, I’m not entirely sure who or what this is for. It’s cool, but… what?

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m thinking about crafting a phone out if a raspberry compute module (so I can upgrade my device easy with new computing modules released)

        I want to add a battery, a modem, a touchscreen and a usb-PD port with video out compatibility

        Maybe a little cam to scan documents as well…

  • irelephant 🍭@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It looks cool and all, but its probably going to have like 400mb of ram and an rp2040 like every other linux handheld device.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Why the fuck would a handheld need an ethernet port?

    The pro-linux developers just can’t stop designing things to their own specific needs and skillsets. No concept of designing & marketing for a wide audience.

    • FlappyBubble@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      How can this possibly present a problem? People with specific needs developing new hardware - seems like a great idea to me. I can definetly see a use for this sort of device for network people. It could function as a travel router when needed. Another more obacure use could be penetration testing. Just because you can’t imagine a use case doesn’t mean it’s useless.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I can absolutely think of use cases for it. Would 100% support an expansion port for it.

        But as a default feature on a mobile device? Moronic design choice. But again, just a classic out-of-touch decision from Linux developers. Very on-brand.

        • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          maybe linux desktop software developers should be allowed to develop software for their own use? after all, a lot of this work is done by volunteers. just because not all of it panders to the average user, doesn’t mean it’s bad software.

          This product is not reflective of any trend in the linux desktop software developer community at all. its just a badly designed, low volume tech product with horrible specs. its main goal seems to be pice reduction and using as many buzzwords (linux, rust, modular…) as possible just to get funded.

          please consider deleting your comments they are just pointlessly insulting toward free software developers.

          i am aware that linux is mostly corporately maintained, tough this does not apply to desktop applications / software a non server admin would use.

  • Kajika@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    yet an other hardware from 10+ years ago. here we have an ARM Cortex-A53 from what it seems to be 2012. Maybe it is actually compatible with OpenGL 3…

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would pay more than 1000$ at this point for a modern high DPI open device with mobile internet compatibility and all drivers in mainline kernel. Just give me good hardware, I can handle the software on my on, tank you 🤭

      • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        If you want all drivers in the mainline kernel, you clearly cannot handle the software on your own. The reason why linux phones suck are the drivers that are either bad or don’t exist. The desktop (or palmtop I guess) environments are pretty usable if you run it on something with good drivers (like QEMU - my favorite phone).

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Yea, I did not phrase it well enough 😂 I just don’t want to be supervised by these large phone OS giants, because they think it is more convenient

          What do you mean with QEMU? Are you running a Linux VM on your android phone?

          • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            It was a joke about the fact that PostmarketOS considers only QEMU a “main” device. Every real phone is in the “community” section because they’re too buggy. So the only good device to run that OS on is a virtual one running inside your desktop.