• sturger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I still don’t understand why we’re using humans to review AI code. Shouldn’t AIs be reviewing the code?

    We’re letting AIs do the fun part (coding) and forcing humans to review (the worst part) reams more janky code.

    • greenskye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      AI’s get the fun part of everything right now. AI gets writing, humans get editing. AIs get drawing, humans get fixing hands and details, etc etc

      • Beacon@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What are the results if you take code written by one brand of ai and then have another brand of ai review it? Like use chatgpt to write code, and then ask copilot if the generated code has any errors and will work as intended?

        • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t know, if I put my hand in a fan and then put that mutilated hand into another brand of fan, do you think that might fix it?

        • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Interesting idea, I’ve never tried that. I feel like it wouldn’t be a silver bullet but you might get slightly better results I guess.