“Sugar and starch does not cause harm”

Guess this is another “the dose makes the poison” take, but he contradicts himself at 16:45 talking about inflammation from sugar…

I think Cywes is going down the Saladino route, and I’m probably going to stop listening to his content, its all speculative at this point.

At the 11 minute mark he brings up his insulin suppression theory again. He is using the LMHR study as a basis for this theory, and he is linking “insulin suppression” with CAC progression. I’m not sure how he is making this link from the study, the study itself doesn’t speak to insulin levels.

Carnivore can be too good

“The inuit have compensatory insulin resistance” - I really hate his phrasing, it really should be insulin sparing, or glucose sparing.

Yes the Inuit consume carbohydrates during the summer and during the fall.

Wow, this is new… I would love to see a reference for this (pre-contact Inuit diets). Not alot of berries growing up in the arctic circle.

Cywes has lost the plot, I think he is just making shit up at this point.