CAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 15 天前Denmark's Plan to Fight Deepfakes: Give Citizens Copyright to Their Own Likenessgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square39linkfedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down10cross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkDenmark's Plan to Fight Deepfakes: Give Citizens Copyright to Their Own Likenessgizmodo.comCAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 15 天前message-square39linkfedilinkcross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·15 天前So is there a fair use exemption for satire?
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 天前You definitely don’t read every article that crosses your feed either. I just wanted to know this one thing.
minus-squaree$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 天前Nor should you, no one does. And you’re not alone with this question, seeing the upvotes. So it presumably helped others.
minus-squaree$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 天前It also would still allow parodies and satire, so some of the standard doctrine of fair use would still apply.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 天前Thanks. It’s an interesting approach, and avoids a lot of the funny philosophical questions that comes out of banning just a certain technology.
So is there a fair use exemption for satire?
Read the article…
You definitely don’t read every article that crosses your feed either.
I just wanted to know this one thing.
Nor should you, no one does. And you’re not alone with this question, seeing the upvotes. So it presumably helped others.
It also would still allow parodies and satire, so some of the standard doctrine of fair use would still apply.
Thanks.
It’s an interesting approach, and avoids a lot of the funny philosophical questions that comes out of banning just a certain technology.