As I said weeks ago: dengue will be a nightmare worldwide. My country, Brazil, has a great plan of action against dengue and 2024 was a disaster cause it was really worse this year.
Take a note: we have free and universal health care, our health system reaches the most remote places inside the country, we have a great vaccination plan, our population takes vaccines, we handle dengue every year very well.
I think Gnome VS KDE it’s just a POV
Your argument makes sense that KDE and Cinnamon can be welcoming to Windows users. However I can argue that it can also make these newcomers to keep a “windows-like” mindset and that can be frustrating.
If a newcomer comes to Gnome, due to it’s totally different paradigm, it may induce this newcomer to have an open mind and, therefore, be more welcoming to linux experience.
I don’t think one argument or the other is right or wrong. I think both arguments are valid and that’s just a different perspective. I, personally, think that a totally new paradigm is good to newcomers, but be free to disagree, since you understand that there is no right or wrong regarding this topic
I like the mint project, but I dislike how it’s done
I don’t suggest mint to anyone anymore. I rather suggest Fedora or PopOs
Fuck U.S.
That’s because…
I’M A MICROSOFT EMPLOYEE IN DISGUISE!!!
Assume whatever you want. I don’t care
You totally missed the point I was trying to say. And I’m not going to explain because of laziness.
I don’t think the world is black or white. Of course Microsoft can make bad choices and prioritize profit, but Microsoft isn’t a person or and entity. MS is an enterprise driven by people that work there.
Linux community or any other community can also make bad choices, afterall it’s also people-driven and people are flawed.
I don’t excuse MS for really bad choices, but also don’t blame it. I just think that’s better to see the world complex as it is, not by judging stuff as ‘bad’ or ‘good’.
I know. That’s why I’m using native Firefox version, which works flawlessly
Not only because of performance issues, but also because it’s clunky sometimes. For example, I cannot use KeePassXC Browser extension on Flatpak Firefox cause this implementation is borked. However in native version works flawlessly
Firefox is one of the few exceptions I suggest always use native version
Fedora comes with Gnome, so it has Gnome Software Center installed by default. Mostly of packages from Fedora is also Flatpaks from Red Hat’s server (not Flathub). They also has Flathub enabled by default
About RPM, I don’t know if Gnome Software Center is able to handle it, cause I don’t use Fedora myself. But at least you may try and see
So you’re calling for Fedora
Install it from your Software Center. It’s really easy and need no command at all.
I always use Flatpak over AUR.
AUR is my last resort
Neither. I use a rolling release distro.
But if I have to use release based distros, I probably would clean install.
Isn’t it easier if you clean install instead of upgrade?
That’s the main issue that make me dislike apt and like pacman so much. Apt always (with me) mess the system when upgrading from a version to another.
Go to Edit > Preferences > System and check where your User Extensions folder is, then extract the xz file to there
Maybe you can also change the extensions folder in this configuration
Hemorragic is not an strain. If you got 1 strain and get recontaminated with a second strain within 6 months, you’ll be in a russian roullete of develop a hemorragic disease