I didn’t mean for you to get upset. I just think that the writer for example of a script has a lot of power to mold things how they want and I feel the only limitation should be that it is entertaining and tells a great story. Of course within whatever system you choose for your univers that should be consistent but we both agree that other than that you can freely pick and choose what the rules of that system are. Again no offense meant 😇 😅

Absolutely, but look at lord of the rings. the orcs while industrialized and definitively in the iron age are not as advanced as the dwarfs or the elves. Then you have the hobbits who still live in dirt holes.

there are a lot of inconsistencies, why are people only focused on the ones that allow people with wheelchair to identify with the main character or whatever?

ty

Thanks for explaining!

it’s a new feature i think

deleted by creator

First of all not all parts of a fictional universe have to have the same level of technological advancements. Within that baseline you can do whatever you want it’s fiction. Also the reader or audience doesn’t know everything there is about the world and might have gaps of knowledge.

If they have steel swords all bets are off

You hate it but it’s still true, it’s a genre set entirely in fictional worlds.

What if the spell simply accelerates the healing process. Basically like a forward targeted reverse time reversal?

This wheel chair looks out of place for the setting

dude…

It’s literally a made up world.

Ice manerfish

My best hyptothesis is that in the center of each of those disks a hole may have been or still is through which pond water is wicking upwards and melting the snow in a circular fashion before freezing and coming to a halt. Hence the almost perfect circular shape and the weird lighter color in the center … notice the crack in the center of the disk in the foreground?

I’m not sure tbh

good question.

How would you implement blocking at the invidual level, i take it you mean it to be content category based?

Freedom of speech is not the same as freedom from consequences for your speech.

It is when it comes to the consequence being not being able to speak. if my speech has at its consequence that it pisses off people in power in a group then freedom of speech means that they wont stifle my speech when it threatens their power or is deemed undesirable for other than rule breaking reasons.

What i mean like the jury system were 12 random users for example might be picked and then they get to vote on a case.