BillyClark

Considering how many more people died from COVID than needed to, simply due to Trump’s actions (and inaction), he’s technically a mass murderer more than a serial killer.

More blatant bribery, as she tries to set up a luxury lifestyle after her husband dies

That sort of depends on how her husband dies.

When I was 10, we didn’t have a computer at home. If homework needed to be typed, I did it on a typewriter.

It was part of the paperwork requested by the person who arranged my loan and there were no follow up questions.

In that email about Trump blowing Bubba, the actual point was to ask whether Putin had the picture.

And it was asked so casually that it seemed like it was the normal course of things to leak incriminating pictures to the Kremlin.

Pete and Repeat are sitting on a bench. Pete jumps off the bench. Who is left sitting on the bench?

Pete and Repeat are sitting on a bench. Pete jumps off the bench. Who is left sitting on the bench?

I once had to “explain the gap in my CV” when applying for a loan. And apparently, “I didn’t feel like working for those 6 months,” wasn’t a good enough explanation. Even though I think literally everybody personally understands the concept.

I ended up saying that I spent the time taking care of my parents, since I did spend some of that time taking care of them.

One important skill for school is to look at the entire question so that you can understand what the teacher is asking for, even if they don’t format the question exactly right.

In this case, your answer would not fit into the 6 spaces provided for the answer.

So you have to ask yourself what they meant by “Write the following words”. Since “the” is the same word repeated twice, once you’ve written “the” after 5, then I could argue that “the” has already been written.

Therefore, if there are only six blanks for the answer, looking at the entire question, I argue that the answer I provided is most likely correct.

1. alphabet
2. come
3. in
4. order
5. the
6. they

I think they are Gaston.

I think people should rate things consistently, and both of those criteria in the post are fairly subjective. Like, they could both vary based on your mood.

Here’s my 3-star rating system, which is less subjective:

*** I would happily watch this movie again, or I have already enjoyed it multiple times.

** It wasn’t bad, but I don’t see myself watching it again.

* I would refuse to watch this again, or I turned it off because I couldn’t watch it once.

Of course, it’s not perfect. Movies like Dear Zachary would be forced to be 2 stars. But for the most part, since star reviews are to help people decide what to watch, if the criteria is whether or not people would want to watch it a lot, I think the intentions line up with the implementation better.

I’m still surprised that all of the January 6 insurrectionists could just storm the capitol building without being shot. They were breaking into the main building that had all of our lawmakers in it at the time, and only one of those morons was shot. Only the stupidest one. The queen of morons.

And did you notice what happened after that idiot was shot and killed? Nobody else tried to go through that window.

Exactly. It’s sad, but in America, if you say something to a cop, and the cop, for example, “misremembers” and says that you confessed to a crime, you can be in hot water. If you simply don’t speak to a cop, then it’s more difficult for the cop to “misremember”.

That’s an extreme example, and it’s getting less likely with cops wearing more bodycams, but there’s simply no reason to take the risk of talking to a cop.

I wouldn’t go for this. Even in Victorian times, the catapult was outdated technology.

Now, then, if it were a trebuchet, then you’d really see how far that baby could go.

Oh my, I hope he didn’t get rid of my private collection.

I suspect that most Linux users are former Windows users.

You can tell from the background that this isn’t my attic.

This is the first time I’ve heard of “TrumpRx”, and let me say, goddamn, Trump is one stupid bastard piece of shit. He really called it “TrumpRx” with his own name in it. He obviously doesn’t realize that “Obamacare” is actually the “Affordable Care Act”, and that it was Obama’s political opponents who first called it “Obamacare.”

Trump is a walking fucking joke.

You’re still not supposed to cite Wikipedia because it is an encyclopedia that contains no original information.

If you use Wikipedia for research, you go to the links that Wikipedia cites, and then you read and cite those, instead.