Der Plot oben ist einfach nur die absolute Differenz zwischen den Prozentpunkten “hohe Bildung” minus “einfache Bildung”? Wer zum Teufel dachte, das ist eine gute Methode, das zu visualisieren? Damit ist der Unterschied bei kleinen Parteien zwangsläufig kleiner.
Es gibt da keine Zielgruppe. [citation needed]
Selbst wenn das Morgenmagazin nicht explizit eine Zielgruppe ansprechen würde, hieße das noch lange nicht, dass es keine “Zielgruppe” gibt.
Wie du schon schreibst
das sind vor allem Familien mit Kindern
die müssen in der Redaktion doch zumindest eine grobe Vorstellung haben, wer ihr Publikkum ist. Das ist nicht mal als Kritik an Ikkimels Auftritt gemeint, sondern Verwunderung über die Entscheidung der Reaktion.
My gaming machine is still using DDR3. Never really saw a reason to upgrade, games mostly became more demanding in the graphics-sector, even the first-gen i5 is doing reasonably well with most games, even newer ones. And if not, I blame badly optimized games.
RAM speed usually is the last thing you have to worry about in games.
In case you are being serious, there are ways around faulty RAM sticks, usually just a few cells/rows are affected. In case anyone needs to know this, here is a pretty good summary on stackoverflow on how to deal with this on linux. In general, look for “memmap”.
Keep your hardware running as long as possible! Iirc newer RAM is unfortunately somewhat more susceptible to failing. My DDR3 is still working fine.
Hell yeah, another fellow user of DDR3. It’ll live forever!
I don’t really see a reason to upgrade, my i5 from 2009 is still running fine. Damn, now that I’m writing it out, that does sound old
Ah, mir ist jetzt erst aufgefallen, dass ich deine Aussage missverstanden habe, tut mir leid, war keine Absicht.
Ich dachte beim OP gehts bei der Regulierung der Raumfeuchtigkeit um ein gutes Raumklima. Im Endeffekt ging’s mir ja auch nur um die Darstellung, dass “Lufttrocknung = Regulierung der Raumfeuchtigkeit” bei Klimaanlagen eine etwas merkwürdige Darstellung ist. Bin wohl etwas übers Ziel hinaus geschossen.
Es wäre mir neu, dass Häuser ohne Klimaanlage alle vom Schimmel befallen sind. Das wäre auch reine Symptombekämpfung. Willst du im Keller im Winter eine Klimaanlage laufen lassen, damit die feuchte Ecke nicht schimmelt?
Abgesehen davon ging es um “regulieren”. Klimaanlagen ziehen durchgehend Feuchtigkeit aus der Luft, das ist kein “regulieren”. Lehm bzw. Ton “reguliert”, in dem Sinne, dass sie Feuchtigkeit auch wieder abgeben, wenn der Raum zu trocken ist, also die Luftfeuchtigkeit auf einem gewissem Niveau halten.
This is your example of capitalism working? Then I don’t want to see it failing.
Das würde ich nicht als “regulieren” bezeichnen
You have to do a bit more than just open the website and immediately dismiss it. Granted, it’s in German, but clicking on the individual reactors gives you a list of incidents there.
If you want something more condensed, here is a list of incidents in
Germany https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_meldepflichtiger_Ereignisse_in_deutschen_kerntechnischen_Anlagen
or Europe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_von_Störfällen_in_europäischen_kerntechnischen_Anlagen
though also only available in German. Just because an incident does not make it to the news, does not mean that no radiation was leaked.
Sure, I basically agree with everything you said. The thing is that even without data centers we’d be in this mess. I’m not trying to defend them, they definitely undo the little progress that was made. However, Trump would have undone the regulations with or without the data centers.
It’s just that it’s not only data centers that are fast tracking climate change. I mean… gestures broadly at everything basically everything is fast tracking climate change.
I guess you definitely are right in the sense that it’s one of the sources that’s among the easiest to get rid of.
That is the part that pains me to admit - running local LLMs is not a solution to the RAMpocalypse. In that case we’d just have more GPUs and RAM idling for ~90% of the time in someones basement, without being shared. As bad as it sounds, having data centers for AI stuff is actually the more ecological solution. I can’t believe I said that. Excuse me, I have to take a shower now *shudder*
Nice of you to side-track with current emissions (per capita even), and not cumulative historical emissions, which were actually mentioned.
Feel free to compare different countries yourself: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-metrics (I’m not sure why ourworldindata doesn’t just put all of this on one page instead of splitting it up. It’s always a hassle to find the right one it even is on the same page, I just didn’t look close enough) The more interesting comparison might be high-income vs low-income countries.
To get back to the discussion: Yes, Europes share is not as huge as it used to be, and it’s getting lower, but what can be seen from @Tehdastehdas@piefed.social graph is that that’s less due to Europe behaving better and rather due to other countries polluting more. Not a good argument for saying “Europe is doing better now”
Don’t blame everything on the data centers. Everything else is doing its part in contributing to climate change.
Apart from that data centers, at the scale at which we seem them pop up now, are way too young to have a considerable effect on the current heat wave. Which doesn’t mean that they won’t in the future. Climate change is, after all, a decades long project
Ich find das an sich eine witzige Idee, aber ich glaube dafür ist das Bild nicht chaotisch genug, es würde zu sehr herausstechen. Und es würde das Bild ziemlich eindeutig datieren.
Vom Stil her hat Katapult Wimmelbilder, in denen so etwas durchaus vorkommen könnte
It’s Erik with a K, goddamnit!
What do you mean by
I’d been pretty skeptical that solar could ever cover its production costs
If you mean EROI, no one should be skeptical about that, unless you are constantly being fed misinformation. Solar panels quickly generate the energy required to produce them, in the worst cases it takes a few years.
And the good thing about solar panels is, they are incredibly durable, once they are put up they just keep on producing energy. Personally, I would argue that as long as not every roof is covered with them, recycling solar panels is bad. Why replace something that is still producing energy (and at that point for free, in EROI terms), when you could leave the old ones up and put the new panels on roofs that have none yet.
Luckily, companies are starting to see that as well, and refurbish solar panels instead of recycling them.
There’s a reason it goes reduce -> reuse -> recycle.
Sorry, but what about that is specific to EVs? Nothing you mention is specific to EVs, but applies to all new cars. Except for your unwarranted fearmongering about the battery. Basically every car manufacturer offers a 8 year warranty on the battery, so you can assume that they last longer than that.
How does not eating dairy products give you psychic powers?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFCAcQxmYDI