There are several articles there. The first one is about Lebanon. Like I said, you might have to scroll to the one about China if the hash link isn’t taking you there
There are several articles there. The first one is about Lebanon. Like I said, you might have to scroll to the one about China if the hash link isn’t taking you there
Did you click the link? It explains why China isn’t Marxist by going into the history of its revolution. If it sends you to the top scroll down to the article ‘Schematic chronology of the Chinese national epic’.
China is about as far from “Marxist” as you can possibly be. The western bourgeoisie are probably jealous at how effective they are at outlawing and crushing the independent labor movement there.
people with more money than they’ll ever spend complaining about theoretical revenue for something they didnt make. Abolish
copyrightprivate property.
Many communist revolutions were supposed to create these theoretically “equal” societies, but they just insert in a new ruling class.
You’re talking about bolshevik revolution in 1917 (Chinese and the rest were bourgeoisie revolutions), but you’re making this blanket statement about all revolutions. Do you know anything about the specific events that led up to the comintern’s degeneration or are you parroting liberal talking points? Do you know why a new bourgeoisie arose out of the Soviet Union? Hint: it’s not the tankie belief that “revisionists” got ahold of power, nor is it the liberal belief that the state bureaucracy counts as a class and that ALL revolutions lead to one class oppressing another.
Replying with an article that refutes this claim is not on-topic?