254·
1 day agoThey need more Bernies Sanders, AOCs… And that katie person… I forget their last name.
- 0 Posts
- 48 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
Cake day: May 19th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
2·3 days agoSo you’re arguing that misinformation is fair if a campaign has done anything that can be remotely described as damaging (and you refuse to say what they did that was so damaging).
How could Russia harm them by leaking details of things that are not illegal and therefore (purportedly) entirely acceptable?
By including disinformation? It’s a pretty basic concepts, by lying.
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
I’m not sure why so many people are reacting like this to my comments. The Republican Senate Committee was able to accept there was a Russian disinfo campaign, not sure why Lemmy thinks that’s all fine and dandy.
What DNC corruption exactly are you referring to?
The corruption of the electronic was done by Russia and the RNC accepting and not reporting foreign election interference. As per:
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
Could you show what specifically was fake?
I’m not an intelligence agent, so no, I can’t tell you what was and wasn’t faked. You would have to look into the various reports and intelligence findings yourself for that info.
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
I never said anything about the technical details. I said the majority of the content was made up from information already released.
But yeah sure buddy, I’m sure the Senate Intelligence Committee got it wrong /s
Maybe do basic research before you go after someone for something they didn’t discuss. That way you won’t be left looking like an idiot.
There was Russian interference whether you want to believe it or not. I’ll let you go back to your qanon discussion group now.
The charges against Assange were made in 2012.
deleted by creator
“had the DNC simply been operating in a legitimate…”
Sorry, are you under the impression that the DNC has to choose a particular candidate? They don’t. That stuff is internal party politics. There’s no US law governing who they choose. That’s how party politics works.
This is some third world shit going down. Hey America: long term violent protests combined with a general strike.
Plan a a date, print up flyers. Do it.
Seeing as it was just patched together from other releases with Russian disinfo laced in between - it should have been removed a long time ago. Look up who submitted it to Wikileaks: Guccifer 2.0… who turned out to be a Russian agent (aka Fancy Bear).
Go look at Guccifer 2.0’s Wikipedia page, or the US intelligence senate hearing that confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 election. All this info is put there.
Assange thought it was win favor with Trump and maybe get him a pardon. Went as far as to continue to attribute the “leak” to staffer Seth Rich, even after Rich’s death in a botched burgulary.
Ghislaine’s father had several leaders and ex-leaders of Mossad at his funeral, and the Prime Minister of Israel gave the eulogy.
Definately stuff going on.
213·9 days agodeleted by creator
Most countries are corrupt backwards dictatorships… So that might be the best standard to use.
Or through blackmail.
He’s a good example of a shallow fake.
4·13 days agoLugaru and Overgrowth.
I use the cheapest serrated knives, they come in a set of four, and are idiots who each take a tiny bite of food when you move them along.
… perhaps they’re not even knives, but are wood saws for food.
Your grandfather’s knives could whisper to them 24/7 until their bodies rust, they’d still just be my little idiots who cost four dollars and only cut when I move them along.
And cut they do, just with no sense of danger or spite, they only take their tiny portions and giggle until it’s their turn again. Which is only when I move them, back and forth until they get through.
How’s he gonna pay the rest of the $1.499 billion though?
Honestly, the quickest way out is to officially order the summary executions of the judges who established this new immunity - then pass a second law ordering that SCOTUS must always evenly represent all major parties, one out, one in.
Then get new judges in that will reverse the immunity ruling. That way this sort of problem won’t come up again.
Sometimes the tree of liberty needs to be watered with blood. This is may be one of those times.