I had these runs early on, as well - where the rock I need to win simply is not present, or is so rare that I would have needed to be an expert to mine it.
They seem to have improved the randomizer, since then. I haven’t had that happen, lately - where the ore I need is too rare.
Also, mods that slash the ammo refill costs to 40 go a long way toward making DRG a much more relaxed gameplay.
Great recommendation!
And there is an accessible game play mode available that turns off the dome defense portion of the game, as well.
Stable Diffusion is open source and at least has options for all of that in the web UI (which you can host locally).
I wouldn’t bet on successful runs on a latop, though. I have a powerful desktop gaming rig, and I still get OOM (out of memory) errors trying to do things with it.
Of course, there’s definitely a crazy learning curve for optimizing this stuff. So by “can’t work on a laptop” what I really mean is that I couldn’t get it working on my laptop, when I tried.
For simple math that could work, and as long as the question is close enough to an exact match with plenty of published examples to copy.
A good rule of thumb is that the script it will come up with is about as likely to be correct as blindly taking the highest voted answer to the most similar question on Stack Overflow.
If the question is simple and common, the odds are quite good. If the question is nuanced or rare, the odds of a correct result drop off aggressively.
You’ve misspelled “Fuck JK Rowling” there, mate.
I’m beginning to suspect we’re allowed to swear here…
Good one. The only worthy reply I can think of:
Fuck JK Rowling
Voxlibre has solid cozy / accessible settings, and great multiplayer support. (And is free!)
I would have loves Terraria with combat turned off. Thanks, I didn’t realize that’s an option, now.
+1 to Palworld. The difficulty/accessibility settings are very good for achieving co-op chill vibes.
I would have upvoted this, but my client shows perfectly negative vote count, and that’s too funn to break.
Made me laugh. Thanks.
Certain algorithms do require knowing which way to orient the cube first, so some knowledge of the state of the cube is required.
You’re in luck! We don’t keep any of our guns in California.
politicians like political donations.
Doesn’t matter. All the humanoid robots will do my bidding in a few years, because nobody knows how to secure their shit, anymore.
Don’t worry, I’ll be a benevolent ruler.
(This is obviously a joke.)
That said, if every single robot in the world sings and does the hokey pokey at midnight - local time - on my birthday… you’re welcome, I guess.
If your code is open source, you could try posting code links and questions to relevant communities here on Lemmy.
Edit: You might attract users and collaborators that way, as well.
I had not heard of that. Fascinating! Thanks!
Thanks. I think every data point helps people.
I can’t say that particularly shocks me. I imagine that Chat GPT has probably swallowed dozens of Physics textbooks.
The bigger part of the problem is knowing where we are on the human knowledge novelty / training data available curve, or rather, when we need to get off of the ride.
Edit: Any chance your chosen AI has access to Wolfram Alpha as an MCP Tool? Because that would be very different, too.
If it’s successful at math, there’s likely much more than a learning model in play.
Which brings us back to the opacity problem. :(
If the answer machine has been cleverly rigged (and weighted) to pass off math questions to more capable software, things can be great.
But a person who just hears that AI can do math now can have a very bad time if they go blindly use a brute force pleasant answer machine on a math problem. :(