Exactly, liberal means both German center-right CDU and the US Dem mainstream. They are on the same ideology.
Exactly, liberal means both German center-right CDU and the US Dem mainstream. They are on the same ideology.
Us young men get the same treatment but with scumbags like Andrew Tate, go figure.
I feel the pain.
Because the alternative seems to be a Russian intelligence asset.
This nation is founded on stolen land (just like Mexico)
Isn’t pretty much every nation founded on stolen land?
drug and pregnancy tests
What in the world necessitates those?
Yeah but on the ground you can roll slower than 250 kph though.
Same qualification though. You need to be a qualified ATC to clear a taxi, and air law states that the ground rolling stage as soon as the plane is moving under its own power is part of the flight. It goes as far as this is a flight accident and will be treated accordingly.
I understand.
Though the only piece of news that reached me recently about magdumping police cruisers, it was a cop magdumping his own car.
Americans can turn a handgun into a machine gun with a cheap piece of plastic.
As someone who can count the number of guns I’ve ever seen on my hands, this is incredibly sensationalist. Machine guns are rifle-calibre automatic weapons with significant weight and recoil. You aren’t making one out of a handgun and some cheap piece of plastic if you are not living in Naked Gun.
How does it come out when factoring in inflation, especially the recent spike?
I would be fine with “at least don’t let them self-regulate”, same with aerospace.
I guess the problem is that app developers write the installers, and they suck at following conventions. Obligatory fuck Snap, as it creates a folder in the home dir, and it doesn’t even bother to hide it, and it is not even reconfigurable.
namely the countries that got upset, or companies that come from there.
I guess the point is that the rich countries and companies are actually happy with this outcome, since less of the pesky NGOs that bother them in the same country can attend.
The point is, contrary to how the article wants to portray it, or you are portraying it, it’s not the rich countries or the companies complaining, but the NGOs fighting for climate conscious policies in those rich countries. They say that this makes it so that the rich countries can control who can go to the conference and who can’t. So this actually helps those rich polluting governments and companies.
or /opt, or a binary in some hidden folder in /home…
The actual title is:
Bigger share of COP29 badges for Global South NGOs upsets rich-country groups
And the opposing argument is that the reduction of badges for NGOs from Western Europe et al. effectively makes it so that the governments of the countries with the largest emissions can control who gets to observe the conference from their respective countries. This is coupled with the fact that fewer people can attend in the first place than last time, since the venue is smaller.
To be honest, I don’t know who’s in the right here, but the article definitely feels like it’s taking a side, and the editorialized title makes that bias worse.
I think more observers, and a larger venue, could be justified for the biggest climate conference of the world. I think this event should be more important than “you will own nothing and be happy” Davos for example.
Check out a buying guide, they have the weirdest way of presenting what you get for what you buy.
To your first point, I’m just saying that the problem politicians created by defunding education is not going to be solved by politicians banning books.
On the other thing, should it be available? Yes. Should it be blasted in your face at the expense of everything else without context? Hell no. Imagine if Fox News was only available with live fact-checking, it would not be nearly as effective.
Same reason Boeing went to shit. Union workforces do quality work.
He learned his lesson /s