I tried to look for something like this happening before and don’t see anything. Maybe it’s my bad searching skills, but this is definitely not great for Trump’s plans. Not certain how convincing it is politically though.

This is a gift article so no need for archive.

I’m not the most experienced with Ubuntu, but the way that comes to mind is setting up shortcuts manually to try to match MacOS. It would be a bit tedious honestly. I’m hoping somebody comes along and knows of a library that already does that.

I feel like no one is addressing the fact that this shouldn’t be happening very frequently as your making it sound. Either you’re drinking too much, to the point of being alcoholic. That or something is wrong with your body.

I feel you have literally picked the single most unique example for markets not going up. You make it seem like the US’s market will need to experience the same thing eventually, and I don’t think most people would agree with that assertion. Japan’s economy is a very strange and unique case.

We can’t know for sure, but its historically been the case. In addition, the expectation for infinite growth stems a lot from continued research and development. We continue to make processes more efficient making products cheaper and easier for more people to buy. You can say that the econmy will stop growing at some point, but we just don’t know when that may happen.

Digit loop took me too long to understand. Its a ring.

Wow this is a shitty headline, and the commissioner is an idiot too. A company wants to advertise their brand at the rally, and wants someone to wear their logo there. So it was not “Trump” that paid them (at least we have no evidence to suggest that) and they were paid to advertise rather than just attend. Lets talk about the the real problems Trump, the 34 time felon, actually has.

This doesn’t seem very health to me. Your partner doesn’t want another pet, which should be something that gets discussed more. The way you worded it, it almost sounds like your partner doesn’t like pets a lot (but they seem to own a cat already). I feel that’s a point of friction to be addressed. Maybe you like pets more than they do, or maybe there really is a financial reason to wait. Pets, properly taken care of, are very experience from what I’ve heard, and you both already have 2. If both of your goals is to get a home, seeing how getting a 3rd pet would impact your financials is a good step to take. This includes medical costs and some assumption of additional medical costs. Maybe it doesn’t really impact buying a house all that much, maybe it does.

The fact that you’re fine with making your SO mad is a bit concerning. You really are fine with making them mad, to make yourself happy? Their opinions, nor feelings don’t really matter to you? It seems like you’re almost trying to get a pet to replace the emotional support you would like from your partner. Is there anyway to fix that with your SO?

Another thing is that, are you both on the same page of what you’re trying to prioritize? He seems to prioritize a home, and for you the priority is getting a pet. The mismatch is the problem more so than each of your highest priorities.

This article touches on important: what are the Democrats in Congress doing to prepare for another Trump presidency?

He’s been pretty vocal about his vindictive he wants to be so you would expect them to say least be trying to push laws to restrict the abuse that he, or any other president could on political enemies.

The article mentions a bipartisan bill that passed the house but couldn’t get through the Senate. Why aren’t Democrats talking about that bill more publicly to get it passed?

Its about convincing people still on the fence with Trump. The most vocal are saying that the jury was a sham. The ones in the middle are less vocal. By not giving vocal Republicans any ammo, it helps make a convincing case to those Republican voters that weren’t hardline republicans/MAGAs. They’re the ones we need along with the voters that switch from the 2016 to 2020 elections.

Yeah, so the fact that he wasn’t proves my point. The Judge wasn’t showing signs of wanting to get Trump convicted. Compare that to if Trump is required to be in jail throughout the trail, because he was held in contempt. The right would be saying the judge, and this same verdict, were corrupt. That’s what they’re saying, now but there’s less evidence for them to use.

I disagree with that. The judges need to be a bit lenient with him so nobody can say that the judge was biased against him. This was sort of frustrating to those of us who saw the judge as being too nice to Trump, but its now a lot harder to say he was gunning to get him convicted.

You’re right but that’s not the problem attempting to be addressed with Denmark’s system.

Will look into that to see if that’s easier that what I currently do now. Thanks!

More or less what I have to do.

Will do.

Or a product of the current news setting. You’re basically saying that all R voters are complete idiots when they make up a large portion of the country (not the majority of course). This line of statements encourages R voters to entrench themselves, while not looking great to those on the fence.

I have friends who I respect that I’d classify as either R or on the fence. Where they get their news (Youtube, TikTok, Fox) is very attractive to their views but also incorrect at times. These sources are, for all intensive purposes, their eyes and ears of the political world. How can they not trust their eyes and ears?

Some people start to come around because lies start to break apart after a while. Some that are mad that the Covid hoax, which isn’t real, but is also going away in spring of 2020, and can’t really hurt people, still killed their family members. They see glimpses of Trump being an idiot, and dangerous and start to question what they’re being told and weather Biden is such a bad option in comparison. Making it easier for people to change their minds, and not insulting them and their friends, makes it easier to get people to vote blue or not vote red.

What industry? I’m more of less in the same boat as you. I’m in tech, and this articles assessment seems pretty spot on from my perspective.

I guess it feels surprising they care about long term problem vs ignoring that for short term profit