The voting mechanism enabled “the wisdom of crowds.”
The voting mechanism enabled “the wisdom of crowds.”
But that means I have to read them all. One of the things that drew me to the other platforms was the fact that the smartest or whittiest answers came to the top.
Don’t the comments sort in order of popularity?
I think a bigger issue is the acceptance of logical falicies leading to arguments that are nothing more than insult wars.
I can think of several instances but one that comes to the top was a long well reasoned argument for FM on phones. The writer put a great deal of effort into it then ended it with “do you know how stupid you sound [for taking the other position].” I made the mistake of pointing this out and was met with downvotes and told it was a very reddit thing to say.
I would love to see a platform where fallacious arguments were excluded until resubmitted or at least flagged. They do not encourage reasoned discourse.
Stressful, expensive, hard working and statistically unproductive.
But the founder is expected to use capital they don’t have to fund the business until it is attractive to people with capital. They are expected to market the product without marketing experience. They are expected to negotiate with people who are negotiating from a position of strength and who has much more experience. They are expected to be personally attractive to get interest from VCs. After they have gotten traction they are expected to be “coachable” and follow the advice of advisors that up until now have not been involved in the growth of the company.
The ecosystem is broken. Founders rarely get funding and when they do they end up losing most of the business they built. VCs are getting very few positive results.
Psychiatrist prescribe drugs not psychologists.
Do you believe in unfettered free markets? Those jobs are very often to implement compliance to restrictions in the markets.
“Startup founder”
I think new amateur speculators have driven up prices too. Honestly I don’t fault Mexicans for charging Americans more. It just made me decide I don’t need to be a gentrifier. I can stay in the US.
I priced airbnbs in Oaxaca then hopped on to a VPN exiting in Brazil and got better prices. Then the next time I tried that I didn’t get different pricing.
We could go back to government guaranteed loans based on financial circumstances. And we could go back to tuition rates that were compatible with working your way through college. That system worked pretty well. It did drop some students through the cracks because their families were too wealthy for them to qualify and they couldn’t or wouldn’t work their way to tuition, but it seems like it did a lot less damage than the current system.
Loans that can’t be discharged are the problem. Tuition went out the roof when universities discovered this gold mine.
“food isn’t grown to feed people. Food is grown to make a profit.”
It sucks for Arduino and electronics stuff too, but we are early (I hope.)
Blockchain is gone, just like “space age”, “plastics”, “environmentally friendly”, “digital”, “computer controlled”. Every startup is including “AI” and “sustainable” in their pitch this year.
I imagined something completely different.
Have you been around girls and boys. This makes perfect sense. I think the science might be wrong.
I like location based games, like Niantic has done, but with much less backstory.