Either the 3rd one or the least important one. Whichever causes me the most inconvenience.

Bonus “Mildly infuriating”:

Ask 4 bullet-point questions in an email, they only answer one of them and ignore the rest.

Definitely does, and it’s a beautiful city, but I never want to drive in it ever again lol.

Had to travel there 3 times for work. The first time I rented a car and immediately regretted it. The second and third times I demanded that management reimburse me for taxis instead of the car rental or I wouldn’t go lol.

Boston. IYKYK.

That’s supposedly part of the justification for the quota, but it hasn’t been shown or proven those top 3% or whatever are engaging in any malicious behavior. And it brings me back to "why not just investigate that 3% and deal with them individually? Or make reporting/tools to examine the behavior of those “problematic” 3% of users?

I’ve been outside working in the heat, so the best comparison I can come up with at the moment is how ISPs use the top 3% of power users to justify data caps for everyone.

*3% used as a “low percentage of users” since I don’t remember the exact numbers from the explanation post about this.

Honestly, my opinion is that any vote quota that applies universally is unreasonable and development effort would be better spent identifying the small percentage of accounts that may be abusing the system / manipulating votes and applying a quota to those accounts specifically or making it easier to deal with those identified accounts in some other way.

Like, looking at the modlog, you’ll often see bans with “vote manipulation” as the reason, so that seems to be working fine for everyone else. Maybe put development effort into making those easier to identify rather than arbitrarily limiting everyone who interacts with your instance.

And I’m not convinced that the underlying reason(s) for having the quotas holds water, so if I have a bias here, that would be it.

I genuinely hope that there is no, has been no, and will be no directed personal attacks toward the Piefed devs over this because nobody deserves that kind of crap (especially when they’re building something you use for free), but I completely understand the backlash against this particular anti-feature.

I’m not even on Piefed, but apparently I do have a horse in this race after all. Assuming I’m both reading the code correctly and that this code also handles incoming-federated votes, then my votes to piefed.social are also silently quota’d.

So, if I step away for a few days and come back and catch up in bulk (as I’m wont to do), then assuming the quota of 240 votes per day, only 240 posts and or comments originating from piefed.social are allowed to please me that day. Anything beyond that will seem like it upvoted on my end but will apparently be discarded and the OP will never see them.

If I’m interpreting that wrong, please correct me.

So apparently now I have to play resource management and track how many things on Piefed I upvote lest something I really want the OP to get credit for go silently ignored.

Yeah, please accept my downvote. If I wanted political “humor” I would unblock one of the many, many, many political meme communities this could have been posted in.

In case anyone still doubted that birds are modern day dinosaurs.

Ask and ye shall receive.

I hand wash them all with soap and water, but they all seem to lose their ability to shed off what I cook in them.

You need to oil them after washing them (wipe them down with a thin layer of vegetable oil or shortening).

Also, it may be time to reseason them if everything sticks even if you’re pre-heating it before adding the food. See: https://www.foodandwine.com/how-to-reseason-cast-iron-8600860

I let it be, even if the person is still alive. Anyone can “allege” anything against anyone. Plus, if the friend is a devout follower of someone genuinely controversial, then there’s already a good chance I’m not that close to them and would be cutting them out of my life anyway.

I read through some other links you dropped in another post and, yeah, there’s a good idea in there somewhere but it seems like it would be better handled case-by-case if vote manipulation is suspected.

I’m also not really buying the “These accounts control what you see” argument, especially given how many people simply browse by “new” where the score doesn’t matter for ranking at all. I don’t say that to suggest an ulterior motive, but simply that the problem seems blown way out of proportion and the solution feels poorly thought out and hamfisted.

T’Rinity

If I’m reading that right (my Python is rusty and this is the first I’ve seen of the PieCode), then yeah, it seems only VOTE_QUOTA amount of my votes would be received by Piefed users.

Pardon my French, but that’s horseshit lol.

It applies to received votes too? I thought it was just a quota you can give (I haven’t been following this feature or the drama surrounding it, so forgive my ignorance as I try to get up to speed).

I throw out upvotes like a drunken sailor. At minimum, if someone contributes positively (or at least on-topic) to one of my posts/comments, they get an upvote. It works as a “mark as read” on my end and makes the person feel seen on theirs.

I’m not sure I’d go through 240 a day, but I also wouldn’t want to have the added stress of rationing them out.

The whole quota system feels heavy-handed to me, but I’m not on Piefed so I got no horse in that race.

Yep. My house is block and brick and just soaks up heat all day and very slowly releases it at night. Unless there’s a 20-30 degree (F) difference, it just doesn’t cool down at all. It’s even worse when the night time temps don’t drop significantly until just an hour or two before dawn when it starts heating back up again.

That’s great in the winter since a sunny day can “store” heat for the night, but it’s miserable in the summer and you basically just have to pump it out with A/C.

This week was nice but we had one last week and one’s forecast for this coming week, though I don’t think it’s going to be as bad as the one we got first week of July.

Glad I got my PV system installed before the first one hit. A/C just feels cooler when it’s free 😎

Heatwaves notwithstanding, still prefer summer. I hate shoveling snow, I hate being cold, I hate that people deal with slick roads every year but still can’t learn to drive (or NOT drive) on them, etc. My only complaints about summer are the humidity and mosquitos.

Ah, yeah, you can have most devices with lithium batteries in your checked baggage, but they have to be off and packed so they’re protected from damage. It’s preferred for those to be carry-on items but isn’t required.

Power banks, vapes, spare batteries, etc are specifically prohibited in checked baggage and must be in your carry-on or on your person.

–https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/lithium-batteries-baggage