- 9 Posts
- 120 Comments
31·22 hours agoSo I’m supposed to know about an article that was written a decade ago. It’s a joke, relax.
Are you sure you weren’t smoking something
It is frustrating. I still haven’t found that damn Grail yet.
No bodies I suppose. The old bait and switch.
I can’t remember the last time I had a cable subscription. It’s been a while.
2·2 days agoThat sounds about right. I heard that the recommendation from AI to put glue on your pizza was from a joke on Reddit about how to keep cheese from falling off the pizza. So obviously the AI doesn’t know what a good source of information is from a bad source of information. But as you say something that’s fuzzy and doesn’t need to be 100% accurate works pretty well apparently. Also my logic is a little fuzzy once in awhile myself.
For a while Google said they would revolutionize search with artificial intelligence. That hasn’t been my experience. Someone here mentioned working on the creative side instead. And that seems to be working out better for me.
Well, using the definition that artificial means man made then no. Human intelligence wasn’t made by humans therefore it isn’t artificial.
She might be full of crap. I don’t know. You would probably understand it better than I do.
I hope someday we can come up with an economic system that is not based purely on profit and the exploitation of human beings. But I don’t know that I’ll live long enough to see it.
Found a link to Kate Crawford’s research. The quote is near the bottom of the article. It’s interesting, anyway.
The person who said AI is neither artificial nor intelligent was Kate Crawford. Every source I try to find is paywalled.
That’s what Gemini said.
I found a non paywalled article where scientists from Oxford University state that feeding AI synthetic data from other AI models could lead to a collapse.
Which reminds me. Reality TV isn’t real.